It is Finished: A Homily for Good Friday

Apostles Anglican Church
Fr. John A. Roop

Good Friday (29 March) 2024
(Isaiah 52:13-53:12, Psalm 22:1-11, Hebrews 10:1-25, John 19:1-37)

In the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

I once read somewhere that the only proper response to the Akedah, the story of the binding and near sacrifice of Isaac, is to put your hand over your mouth and to say nothing at all. The story is unspeakable in that it lies beyond words to frame or express the great mystery at its heart. If that is true of the Akedah, which serves primarily as a signpost pointing toward the fulfillment of the story in Jesus, then how much more is it true of the Crucifixion? As a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he opened not his mouth, Isaiah writes about Jesus before his accusers. But those words likely should apply also to us — perhaps first of all to preachers, perhaps first of all to me — standing before the cross. And, if we cannot be silent — and it does seem that something must be said — then at least we can be prayerful.

The Lord be with you.
And with your spirit.

Let us pray.

Both here and in all your churches throughout the whole world,
we adore you, O Christ, and we bless you,
because by your holy cross you have redeemed the world. Amen.

In 1937 Pablo Picasso painted what is arguably his most well known and influential work: an enormous canvas — 11.5 feet tall by 25.5 feet long — showing the horrors of war, specifically the bombing of the Basque village of Guernica during the early years of the Spanish Civil War. It shows — large scale and yet in intimate detail — the violence, the chaos, the human and animal suffering attendant human power struggles: fire and smoke, wounded animals, a dismembered soldier, a screaming mother holding her lifeless baby — a panorama of human misery writ large across all creation, and all under the watchful eye of a naked light bulb hanging from the ceiling, the eye of God, if there is a god, watching his creation spiraling downward toward the tohu va bohu, the original chaos that preceded God’s “Let there be.” Such is the nature of war as Picasso depicts it.

Using not paint but only words on vellum or parchment, St. John created a similar panorama some two millennia earlier — an enormous mural not of war or a particular battle, but of the human sin and degradation that spans the whole of human history and the better part of two chapters of his Gospel. It is more horrible and sweeping than Picasso could imagine, and more all-inclusive; if we look closely, we find ourselves there. Let’s linger a few moments to take it in.

Judas figures prominently in the mural as he leads a band of soldiers into the Garden across the brook Kidron, knowing that Jesus will be there. A pointing of fingers, a greeting, a kiss: an act of human treachery so sinful, so faithless and puzzling that two thousand years later we are still left scratching our heads in disbelief. A man who had healed in Jesus’ name, cast our demons in Jesus’ name, heard the words of life from Jesus’ lips, had his feet washed just hours earlier by Jesus’ own hands now betrays him. Verses from Psalm 55 add their color to the painting:

12 For it is not an enemy who has done me this dishonor, *
for then I could have borne it;
13 Neither was it my adversary who exalted himself against me, *
for then I would have hidden myself from him.
14 But it was you, my companion, *
my comrade and my own familiar friend.
15 We took sweet counsel together *
and walked in the house of God as friends (Ps 55:12-15, BCP 2019, p. 338).

Judas isn’t alone; there are soldiers gathered around him in the mural, soldiers complicit in the great betrayal simply by following their orders, simply by being part of a machine that grinds people up and spits them out with unthinking efficiency. It is not treachery, certainly; perhaps indifference describes it better, but no less a sin than treachery.

When the soldiers have apprehended Jesus, they take him to Caiaphas the high priest and his father-in-law Annas, the true puppet master pulling the religious strings. And St. John reminds us that it was Caiaphas who had “advised the Jews that it would be expedient that one man should die for the people,” the great sin of scapegoating. And isn’t that term telling, scapegoating — the sloughing off of the sins of the people onto an innocent victim that is then driven out to its destruction? We know nothing about that do we? The Nazis scapegoated the Jews, the Romany, the homosexuals, the defective. The Jim Crow legislators and local thugs scapegoated their African-American fellow citizens, fellow men. The Chinese Communists scapegoated the intellectuals and the Christians. The Hutus scapegoated the Tutsis. And so goes human history. The sin of scapegoating predates the Day of Atonement, though God named it then for what it was and is.

And, standing around a charcoal fire in the High Priest’s courtyard, standing near the light and heat yet somehow still lurking in the shadows of the mural, is Simon Peter, the stalwart disciple who in his bravado had pledged just hours prior to die with Jesus if necessary. “I am not,” he says not once this night but three times when asked if he is Jesus’ disciple. So fearful, so cowardly is he in that moment that the “rock” before whom the gates of hell should tremble finds himself trembling in the presence of a servant girl. Is cowardice a sin? Well, it’s hardly a virtue, and it has certainly felt sinful to me each time I have given way before it. If sin is failure to do and to be what God intends one to do and to be, then sin this was.

Our gaze moves on from Peter in the High Priest’s courtyard to Jesus in the governor’s headquarters, to the seat of Roman power and justice. “Are you the King of the Jews?” Pilate asks Jesus. And, as a later conversation shows, Pilate is not interested in justice or in truth, but rather in preserving Roman order and his own position. “Are you the King of the Jews?” really means, “Are you my rival whom I must destroy?” The gods of power and pride and ambition are worshipped in this palace: self-interest raised to the level of idolatry. When Pilate determines initially to release Jesus, it is not because the thinks the accused innocent or even cares whether he might be, but rather because he deems Jesus inconsequential, of no threat to Rome, of no concern to Pilate. And that is the the sin of what — apathy? But, to mollify the Jewish authorities Pilate turns Jesus over to the soldiers for a little sport, a diversion from the tedium of standing guard perhaps. And, for fun or out of boredom or simply because they have become brutal men whose character it is to dehumanize lesser men, they flog Jesus and mock him with a crown of thorns and a purple robe; they strike him and taunt him. There is a haze of acedia, of slothfulness, covering this part of the mural, of brutal men going through the motions doing brutal things because they have not the energy or interest to do anything else. And sloth is a deadly sin.

Pilate was wrong to think this barbarism would satisfy the priests and Sadducees and Pharisees. No, “Crucify him!” is what it will take. And so we see Pilate sitting on his throne of judgment, figuratively and literally washing his hands of the whole affair in an act of supreme annoyance and indifference, annoyed that the Jews had forced his hand and indifferent to the plight of this Jewish peasant standing bloodied before him. If hatred is a sin — and it is — indifference may be worse still. If I hate you, you at least are worthy of my attention, of my emotional energy. But, if I am indifferent? You matter not at all.

Now there is a sense of movement in the mural, a dark negation of the stunning examples of movement in some great works of art, glorious movement like that which Van Gogh captures in sky and clouds and fields of wheat. This movement is solemn, plodding, heavy. It starts outside Pilate’s judgment hall and goes step-by-step toward the opposite frame of the mural, outside the city. We see Jesus “bearing his own cross to the place called The Place of a Skull, which in Aramaic is called Golgotha.” The mural moves us ploddingly but irresistibly toward the ultimate sin of deicide, the murder of God; we want to avert our eyes, but somehow we can’t. And in his verbal painting of this slow march, even St. John seems to lose his theological nerve for a moment; he is factually correct in his reporting, but wanting in his reflection. St. John tells us that Jesus “went out bearing his own cross,” and that is what our eyes see. But that is not the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. Isaiah demands that we look more intently at the image in front of us, that we peer not at it but through it as we do with any icon. St. John tells us that Jesus bore his own cross. Isaiah knows better, paints a fuller picture. It is not his own cross that he bears, and we know it, we see it:

Isaiah 53:4–6 (ESV): 4  Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
5  But he was pierced for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his wounds we are healed.
6  All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way;
and the Lord has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

And now, here, we enter the mural; our sin takes its place there, laid upon the cross that Jesus carries as his own. We have seen, in portrait and impression, the sin of Judas, of Caiaphas and Annas, of Peter, of Pilate and the soldiers, of self-serving religion and brutal empire, of idolatry and self-interest and cowardice. And Jesus was able to stand under these, but not under the full weight of the cross. It is not in Scripture, but the tradition of Mother Church tells us that Jesus fell under the weight of the cross, that the weight of the sin of the whole world was more than the incarnate Son of God was able to bear in his flesh. Scenes from this mural that I have been describing encircle our nave; it is seen in the Stations of the Cross. And in those fourteen icons of devotion along the Way of the Cross, Jesus falls not just once, but three times under the unfathomable weight he bears:

He who lifts our fallen nature
Low now falls amidst the din,
Bearing more than cross his burden
Grievous load of all our sin,
Deeper, far more sharply cutting
Is the weight he bears within (Francis Gray and Larry Lossing, The Way of the Cross, Parish Press of The Cathedral Church of St. Paul, Fond du Lac, WI).

We keep following the movement in the mural and we see Jesus arrive at Golgotha. Mercifully, as if to spare us graphic images of the consequences of our sin being laid upon the sinless one, St. John simply says, “There they crucified him.” As we look around — now at the cross, now at something else — little details clamor for our attention, further evidence of the sin that suffuses the canvas: Pilate’s final insult to the Jews, an inscription proclaiming “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews,” a reminder of what Rome thinks about and does to Jewish rebels; the soldiers parting Jesus’ clothes among themselves, the avarice of grave-robbing; the disciples — save only St. John and the holy women — conspicuous by their absence, blank spaces on the canvas where they should have been standing, their self-preservation overcoming devotion. This portion of the canvas is a bit shabby, mankind reduced to its basest level, a bit tired and worn as if entropy were finally consolidating its reign, the wearing down and wearing out of all things. Chesterton got it right: we have sinned and grown old, and the canvas shows our age.

But keep looking; something surpassing strange begins to happen, as if a whirlwind entered the frame and took hold of the images there, uprooting them, tearing them from their familiar moorings, spinning them round and round and moving them with gale force toward a single, focal point. Judas is on the move, lips still puckered as for a kiss, the soldiers, too, though stripped now of their weapons. Caiaphas and Annas are tumbling along, the dignity and authority of the high priesthood left far behind as they scramble and scrabble for something sure to grasp. Even Peter is spinning, dervish-like, with a rooster crowing and flapping about his head. Pilate has been brought down from his throne — ripped from it — no longer in charge but tripping along in procession with the rabble.

The whirlwind keeps growing as it sucks up everything in its path. It is like some great plague of locusts: everything lush before it and barren behind. The hammer and nails are ripped from the soldier’s firm grip as he goes tumbling head over heals. The disciples’ hiding places are demolished as the whirlwind passes over and they are exposed. All things have been cut loose. All things are spinning now. All things are being sucked into the vortex: all treachery, all indifference, all scapegoating, all cowardice, all pride, all selfish ambition and abuse of power, all avarice, all acedia — all the sin of the world throughout all its wearied ages and all ages yet to come, your sin and mine — all of it spinning and whirling and racing inexorably toward a single point as if it is being drawn there. And at that focal point of all that is and was and ever shall be there hangs a man — and more than a man — on a cross. As the whirlwind envelops him, he becomes the still eye of the great storm. It is still enough, quiet enough around him that we catch his final breath as he breathes in the whirlwind, as he takes into and upon himself the raging fury of all the sin of the world, and then breathes out his final words: “It is finished.”

And now, we let our eyes wander over the canvas. The vast panorama of human depravity is stripped clean now, stark white but for two broad brush strokes, one vertical and one horizontal, intersecting at the still point of sin and grace, of heaven and earth, of God and man, not separating the pairs but joining them. And we know that St. John was right when he wrote of Jesus:

1 John 2:2 (ESV): 2 He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

There is mystery here, and wonder. There are chapters of the story yet to be written, an empty canvas on which the Artist can and will fashion a new masterpiece. But those are not for us this day. On this day we stand looking, perhaps through tears, at the two cruciform brushstrokes on the otherwise empty canvas. And we say:

Both here and in all your churches throughout the whole world,
we adore you, O Christ, and we bless you,
because by your holy cross you have redeemed the world. Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

GOOD FRIDAY SOLEMN COLLECTS

From the fifth century, and possibly as early as the third, the Western Church has prayed the Solemn Collects or Solemn Intercessions on Good Friday, a series of bidding prayers or intercessions for the Church and for the world. It is traditional in the Solemn Collects to offer prayer for the Jewish people, as in this bidding and collect from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer 2019:

Let us pray for the Jewish people: that the Lord our God may look graciously upon them, and that they may come to know Jesus as the Messiah, and as the Lord of all.

Silence.

Almighty and everlasting God, you established your covenant with Abraham and his seed: Hear the prayers of your Church, that the people through whom you brought blessing to the world may also receive the blessing of salvation, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen (BCP 2019, p. 570).

As we offer these prayers there are two (nearly) equal and opposite extremes to be avoided: anti-Semitism and Zionism. The former is uncritical, and theologically fallacious, condemnation of the first century Jewish people (and their descendants) as uniquely responsible for the death of Christ. The latter is uncritical, and theologically fallacious, support of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries state of Israel as the fulfillment of God’s covenant with Abraham. Neither of these, anti-Semitism nor Zionism, have anything to do with the Solemn Collects.

We pray for the salvation of the Jewish people because they are the chosen of God through whom, in the person of Jesus Christ, salvation has come to all the world. We pray for the salvation of the Jewish people because they have been, from the calling of Abram, and are even now a unique and integral part of God’s redemptive plan. We pray for the salvation of the Jewish people because theirs is the rootstock — the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, the promises, the patriarchs (see Rom 9:4-5) — into which all the faithful in Christ are grafted. We pray for the salvation of the Jewish people because in the unsearchable judgments and inscrutable ways of God, a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in (see Rom 11:25, 33).

As regards the gospel, they are enemies for your sake. But as regards election they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers (Rom 11:28).

In the Solemn Collects the Church prays for all those who do not believe in Christ remembering especially our elder brothers in the faith, the Jewish people. It is a good and biblical prayer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives

Session 8: Anglican Spiritual Formation

APOSTLES ANGLICAN CHURCH
Fr. John A. Roop

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives
Session 8: Anglican Spiritual Formation

The Lord be with you.
And with your spirit.

Let us pray.

Thanks be to thee, Lord Jesus Christ, for all the pains and insults thou hast borne for us, and all the benefits thou hast given us. O most merciful Redeemer, Friend, and Brother: Grant that we may see thee more clearly, love thee more dearly, and follow thee more dearly, day by day. Amen. (adapted, BCP 2019, p. 672)

IN MY EXPERIENCE, Evangelicals take the Great Commission very seriously: Jesus’ commandment to make disciples in all the world, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that Jesus commanded (cf Matt 28:18-20). That is one of the great Evangelical strengths, and thank God for it. What Evangelicals don’t seem quite as keen on — and, of course, this is not true for all Evangelicals — is follow up: making converts, yes, making disciples, not quite so much.

Suppose one of these new converts came to you with these questions: What now? Now that I am a Christian, what is it that I am meant to do?

How would you answer him/her? Well, there are many things that need to be said; it would be a long conversation. But starting with St. Paul’s instructions to the Ephesians would not be a bad place to begin. [Refer class to handout.]

Ephesians 4:1-7,10-16 (ESV): 4 I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, 2 with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, 3 eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. 4 There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call— 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. 7 But grace was given to each one of us according to the measure of Christ’s gift.

10 He who descended is the one who also ascended far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things.) 11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, 12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. 15 Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, 16 from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.

What now? What am I meant to do? “Grow up,” Paul says. Don’t stay a child in the faith, but rather become mature, complete in Christ.

This process of growth is called by different names. Some call it sanctification. Our Orthodox brothers and sisters call it theosis or divinization, i.e., growing in the divine life. I’ll use a rather more mundane name, but a good Anglican name nonetheless: spiritual formation — being shaped, formed, and molded into the likeness of Christ.

Spiritual formation is a good, classical term, and it has this to commend it; the imagery is biblical. Isaiah, and Paul alluding to him, describes God as a potter and Israel as clay:

Isaiah 64:8 (ESV): 8  But now, O Lord, you are our Father;
we are the clay, and you are our potter;
we are all the work of your hand.

Spiritual formation is first and foremost a work of God on his people. But, as with most else in the Christian life, there is a dual agency in spiritual formation also: two parties working jointly, God and us. Spiritual formation is not passive; we don’t simply wait for God to form us. Nor is it something we can accomplish independently of the grace of God going before us and enabling us. Fr. Stephen Gauthier, Canon Theologian of the (ACNA) Diocese of the Upper Midwest, uses a phrase I like very much: God does everything, but we must do something.

So, what part do we play — always in response to God — in our spiritual formation? What must we do? I suggest that we can find an answer in the Rite of Holy Baptism, particularly in the Litany for the Candidates (BCP 2019, pp. 166-167). These are means that God uses to form us, and means whereby we cooperate with God’s work. I might describe it as a five-fold regula, a five-part rule of life. [Refer class to handout.]

LITANY FOR THE CANDIDATES

The Deacon, or other person appointed, may say

Let us now pray for these Candidates who are to receive the Sacrament of Baptism.

That these children may come to confess their faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

[I] That all these Candidates may continue in the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in the prayers.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

[II] That they may walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which they have been called, ever growing in faith and all heavenly virtues.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

[III] That they may persevere in resisting evil, and, whenever they fall into sin, repent and return to the Lord.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

[IV] That they may proclaim by word and deed the Good News of God in Christ Jesus to a lost and broken world.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

That as living members of the Body of Christ, they may grow up in every way into him who is the head.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

That, looking to Jesus, they may run with endurance the race set before them, and at the last receive the unfading crown of glory.

We beseech you to hear us, Good Lord.

This Litany makes two essential points.

1. By its placement within the Rite of Baptism, it emphasizes that, while baptism is the beginning of the Christian life, it is certainly not the end. We are born in water, but we are expected to mature through spiritual formation.

2. The expectation for growth into maturity is for every baptized Christian, not just for some special, elite group. Further, the means of spiritual formation are quite “ordinary” practices accessible to everyone. You don’t have to be a monk or go into the desert for extended periods of fasting.

From this Litany I’d like to extract five practices that Christians for two millennia have found to be central to spiritual formation.

The petition marked [I] in the Litany gives three of the practices; it may look like four, but I’ll summarize them in a three-fold scheme used by Anglican priest and author Martin Thornton.

The baptizand is to continue in (1) the apostles’ teaching, (2) the fellowship, (3) the breaking of bread, and (4) the prayers. How would you describe each of these practices?

The apostles’ teaching denotes hearing, reading, studying, and obeying God’s Word as found in Scripture.

The fellowship means taking one’s place in the worship and life of the church. It also means living life together in the Christian community, becoming part of a different culture.

The breaking of bread is a common way of referring to the Lord’s Supper.

Theprayers indicates the common (shared) prayer of the church, the prayers we offer when we come together. But, without neglecting or minimizing common prayer, we must extend this to our personal prayers as well.

So, let’s put these four things together in an Anglican context — since we are looking at Anglican Christian formation. We might summarize it this way; indeed, Martin Thornton does so in many of his writings:

Daily Office: Morning and Evening Prayer

Weekly Eucharist

Personal Prayer

Daily Office

The invitation to the Confession of Sin in Morning and Evening Prayer summarizes well the main purposes of the Daily Office:

Dearly beloved, the Scriptures teach us to acknowledge our many sins and offenses, not concealing them from our Heavenly Father, but confessing them with humble and obedient hearts that we may obtain forgiveness by his infinite goodness and mercy. We are at all times humbly (1) to acknowledge our sins before Almighty God, but especially when we come together in his presence (2) to give thanks for the great benefits we have received at his hands, (3) to declare his most worthy praise, (4) to hear his holy Word, and (5) to ask, for ourselves and on behalf of others, those things which are necessary for our life and our salvation. Therefore, draw near with me to the throne of heavenly grace (BCP 2019, pp. 11-12).

So, what do we encounter in the Daily Office?

Confession and absolution

Thanksgiving

Worship

Scripture

Petition and intercession

At the heart of the Daily Office we find the Scriptures and the Psalms. Cranmer’s intent with the Book of Common Prayer was that the church would read through the whole of Scripture each year and pray through the Psalms each month. He gave us a calendar of reading — a lectionary — to order that reading. That’s a hefty task, and the BCP 2019 has adapted it a bit. It is possible to keep to Cranmer’s goal, or it is possible to read through the whole of Scripture in two years and the Psalms in sixty days following the lectionary. The instructions on how to do this are found on pages 734 ff in the BCP.

Cranmer simply pointed out the obvious by means of a calendar: if you do not immerse yourself regularly in Scripture and prayer you will not grow in Christlikeness. There is nothing magic about the BCP Lectionary: Anglican, yes, but magic, no. You may benefit from a variety of daily Bible reading calendars. The advantage to the BCP Lectionary is simply that you are reading with your local community and with Anglicans around the world.

Weekly Eucharist

About the Eucharist, the BCP says:

The Holy Communion, commonly called the Lord’s Supper or the Holy Eucharist, is a chief means of grace for sustained and nurtured life in Christ. It is normally the principal service of Christian worship on the Lord’s Day and on other appointed Feasts and Holy Days (BCP 7).

Very significantly for us, this text insists that the Eucharist is a means of grace (the chief means of grace) to sustain and to nurture life in Christ. Nurture connotes growth and flourishing. Real, substantive growth — spiritual formation — is hampered by separation from the Eucharist. I want to speak personally — that is, as one particular priest speaking only for himself — for a moment. I say this with no sense of judgment, except upon myself as an inadequate teacher of the faith. The readiness of many churches to minimize the importance of the Eucharist and the readiness of many people to absent themselves from the Eucharist during the recent COVID pandemic was one of the most disturbing aspects of that period. If we really knew the importance of the Eucharist as the source of Christian life and growth, I am convinced we would be willing to risk death to gather at the altar. Many of our brothers and sisters around the world — those facing persecution for the faith — do risk death to gather. We certainly wouldn’t let trivial things keep us from doing so. With no sense of melodrama, I can say that we do risk spiritual sickness and death if we routinely absent ourselves from Holy Communion We should commit first of all — of prime importance — to remember the Sabbath Day, in our case the day of Resurrection, and to keep it holy by gathering for the Eucharist at least weekly and more often as we are able.

Personal Prayer

Common Prayer does not preclude or minimize personal/private prayer, intimate time spent in God’s presence. Here at Apostles we emphasize the need for personal prayer in our Christian Formation class offerings. Regularly, we offer courses on various types of contemplative prayer: the Jesus Prayer, the Rosary (adapted for Anglican use), lectio divina, praying with icons. We might also include journaling and singing/music in this category. Purportedly St. Augustine said, “To sing is to pray twice.” Of course, what you sing matters greatly: not how well, but what you sing. So, we honor the importance of both Common Prayer and personal prayer.

So far, we have a three-fold scheme for spiritual formation. Let’s add a fourth element by looking at items [II] and [III]. Item [II] mentions growing in faith and heavenly virtues. It is easy to describe what that means, and so awfully hard to really do it. It means “doing what is right and not doing what is wrong:” cultivating the classical, cardinal virtues of prudence, justice, temperance, and fortitude and the theological virtues of faith, hope, and love.

Prudence is the wisdom to judge what is good and proper and appropriate in any circumstance.

Justice is the proper balance between what is right for others and what is right for oneself. Justice is putting things in proper order — in a Christian sense, reestablishing God’s order of things.

Temperance is appropriate self-control, mastery of the passions.

Fortitude is the courage and persistence to act justly and temperately. Notice how item [III] also tells us to persevere in resisting evil.

Classical moral thought has long maintained that these cardinal virtues are acquired by practice. We learn them by doing them. In fact, a virtue is sometimes defined as an acquired habit of righteousness, a second nature that one develops by disciplined practice. We practice, and, when we fail, we repent and start anew.

Christians add to these four cardinal virtues three theological virtues: faith, hope, and love. These differ from the cardinal virtues in one essential aspect: they are not obtained by human effort and training, but are given by God; theologians call them infused virtues. Who am I to disagree? I don’t want to disagree, but I would like to qualify. We cannot achieve love on our own, but we can exercise that degree of love God has given us; the same applies to faith and hope. It seems to me that, even with the theological virtues, virtue neglected is virtue diminished. So, what do we do with regard to the theological virtues? We pray for them and we exercise them.

We might also consider the cultivation of virtues that address the deadly sins.

SIN / VIRTUE

Pride / Humility

Envy / Gratitude

Anger / Patience

Sloth / Diligence

Avarice / Charity (or Generosity)

Gluttony / Temperance

Lust / Chastity

Now, we are up to a four-fold regula:

Daily Office

Weekly Eucharist

Personal Prayer

Cultivation of Virtues

Item [IV] will complete our scheme: proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ in word and deed. This is a matter of exercising your vocation, of doing the work God has given you to do in a manner that brings glory to God and welfare to his people. It is living in the kingdom here and now. I am not speaking here just of what we might call “Christian vocation” — what you do in church, though you should be actively engaged in that type of ministry also. I am speaking of doing whatever you are called and gifted to do as unto God and in such a way that the excellence of your work and the attitude and integrity with which you do it proclaims the Gospel.

Let me give an example from an episode of a television show, The Resident, that I saw a few years ago. A black surgeon and an angry young black man who the surgeon was trying to mentor were riding in the surgeon’s very expensive car after dark. They were pulled over by a police officer for no reason at all; the show wanted to portray it as a clear case of driving while black. The surgeon cautioned his young friend to comply with the officer fully and to treat him respectfully. Of course, you can probably see where this is going. The young man began to mouth off and resist, and the officer drew his weapon. Then something unexpected happened. As the officer leveled his gun he took a couple of steps backward into the street and an oncoming motorcycle hit him. It was a life-threatening injury. The surgeon quickly stepped in and began to stabilize the officer as best he could while he instructed the young man to call for an ambulance. The surgeon accompanied the officer to the hospital and, though off duty, scrubbed in to do the necessary surgery himself. It was touch-and-go, a really difficult procedure, but the officer survived. As the surgeon left the OR, the young man was waiting for him with questions. “Why did you save that man? You don’t really think doing that will change the man’s mind about African-Americans or make him less racist, do you?” Then the surgeon told him:

“It’s not about him. It’s about me and the excellence of my work. In my OR I don’t see colors, just people who need my help.” And then he said the line that has stuck with me ever since I watched the episode: “In the midst of an irredeemable world, I am a righteous man.” Now, there are things wrong with that theologically, but I can’t fault the sentiment. In the realm over which he had any control, he was determined to do the right thing, to be a righteous man, to exercise virtue in his vocation.

That’s exactly what I have in mind in speaking of vocation, with this nuance. We do excellent work — we are righteous men and women — because we are Christians and because that is the way we bring God’s kingdom to bear in the midst of a redeemable but fallen world. Do that in your classroom, in your office, in your home, in your business, behind the wheel of the delivery truck, wherever you are. Gather with other Christians who do the same work and ask them what it looks like to do that work as a Christian. Pray about it. You might know the saying often attributed to St. Francis: “Preach the Gospel. When necessary, use words.” That’s what I have in mind.

So, we have completed a five-fold regular for spiritual formation:

Daily Office

Weekly Eucharist

Personal Prayer

Cultivation of Virtues

Exercise of Vocation

There are other important things we could add, but this is a very good and essential place to start spiritual formation. Here is a recommendation. With prayer and perhaps with the help of a trusted spiritual friend or advisor, look at your life and at this five-fold regula. Find one area in your spiritual formation that needs intentional emphasis. Commit that to God, make a specific intention and plan to grow in that area, and share that commitment with another who can support you in and hold you accountable to your commitment.

I also recommend looking at the list and adding one element that you are not currently doing. Pray about which one that should be, and perhaps discuss it with other wise brothers and sisters in the faith. God will bless and multiply even such feeble efforts as we sometimes make in our effort to co-operate with grace and grow in Christlikeness.

Posted in Catechesis, Confirmation | Leave a comment

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives

Session 7: Sacraments of the Church

APOSTLES ANGLICAN CHURCH
Fr. John A. Roop

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives
Session 7: Church Sacraments (continued)

The Lord be with you.
And with your spirit.

Let us pray.

Guide and direct us, O Lord, always and everywhere with your holy light, that we may discern with clear vision your presence among us, and partake with worthy intention of your divine mysteries. We ask this for Jesus Christ’s sake. Amen (103. Preparation For Public Worship, BCP 2019, p. 676).

I selected this prayer for its emphasis on the “divine mysteries,” a term that denotes the Sacraments of the Church. The prayer reminds us that God is always and everywhere present among us, enlightening us, giving us clear vision to see him, so that we may worthily partake of the divine mysteries (Sacraments). I would also add that it is in and through the divine mysteries that we see God most clearly.

In our last session we focused first on the nature of Sacraments and the sacramental worldview that characterizes the Great Tradition and that distinguishes the churches in that Tradition from non-sacramental churches. Then, we focused specifically on the Gospel Sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion. In this session we will first review just a bit about the nature of Sacraments, then look briefly at the five sacraments of the Church.

Review: Sacraments

In our last session I characterized Sacraments as speech-acts, human words and actions that, by the institution and grace of God, accomplish what they express.

God gives his church words to say, actions to perform, and physical matter to utilize so that in and through the words and actions and material he might act to minister grace to — to be present with and to bless — his people. These speech-acts of the church we call Sacraments.

Our catechism, To Be A Christian (TBAC), offers a more formal and classical definition. According to Q 121 (pp. 55-56):

A sacrament is an outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace. God gives the sign as a means whereby we receive that grace, and as a tangible assurance that we do in fact receive it (1662 Catechism).

The outward and visible sign is comprised of the words we say, the actions we perform, and the material we utilize in the sacrament. It is through these words, actions, and material that God acts to minister grace to us and to assure us tangibly that we have received that grace. We emphasized — because the Church understands it to be so — that the Sacraments are not mere symbols, but are affective channels of grace; to put it somewhat crudely, the Sacraments actually do something. For example, baptism is not merely a symbol of new life; it is the sacramental rite and agent of regeneration. It is in and through the water of baptism that one is born again. That is crucial to the Anglican understanding of Sacraments; Sacraments are effective.

According to the catechism, there are two Gospel or Dominical (of the Lord) Sacraments (Q 123) and five sacraments of the Church (Q 124). The distinction between the two categories of sacraments is a matter of definition based upon command, extent, and purpose.

(1) The Gospel Sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion are (a) commanded/instituted by Christ, (b) for everyone, and (c) generally required for salvation.

(2) The sacraments of the Church — confirmation, confession (absolution), ordination, marriage, and anointing of the sick/dying — (a) were not specifically commanded/instituted by Christ in the Gospels but rather were Apostolic or early church practices, (b) are not required for everyone, and (c) are not required for salvation.

Sometimes we speak of these two categories as the greater and lesser sacraments.

With that bit of review, we may now turn our attention to the Sacraments of the Church.

Sacraments of the Church

As a Christian matures, there are many other points at which God touches him/her with grace, times marked with efficacious outward and visible symbols of God’s inner and hidden grace, the very definition of sacrament. These are the sacraments of the Church: confirmation, confession (absolution), marriage, ordination, and anointing for the sick/dying. As mentioned above, these are not considered as having the nature of Gospel Sacraments because they were neither commanded by Christ nor are they considered as necessary for salvation. Instead, they are sacraments of the Church: outward and visible signs appointed by and recognized by the church — through its Apostolic origin and long history — signs in and through which God has also promised to act.

Confirmation

The sacrament of the Church most clearly related to the Gospel Sacraments is Confirmation.

In Baptism, one is born again and made part of the Body of Christ.

In Holy Communion, one is nourished and grows and participates in the Body of Christ.

In Confirmation, one is commissioned and empowered for mature ministry in the Body of Christ.

It is not unreasonable to think of Confirmation as a rite of passage in the faith. Many — perhaps most — cultures have ceremonies to mark the transition from childhood to adulthood. In Judaism it is the bar or bat mitzvah. Among the Amish it is Rumspringa. In some Hispanic cultures fifteen year old girls have a Quinceañera. The transition from childhood to adulthood would happen without the ceremony — no Jewish boy has to have a bar mitzvah ceremony to become of age and assume the responsibilities of an adult under the Law — but the ceremony is an outward and visible sign of an inward and hidden change.

Confirmation is almost, but not totally, like these other rites of passage. It marks the time when one chooses to take upon himself or herself the adult responsibilities of the faith, and proclaims that publicly. If baptized as an infant, this is the moment when one makes a formal, personal acceptance of the baptismal vows and faith and steps into a mature living out of those vows. That much could happen with or without the Rite of Confirmation.

But, there is more to Confirmation than this, and the difference is what makes Confirmation sacramental. The difference lies in the laying on of hands with prayer by the bishop, the outward sign of the inward and hidden grace that God bestows in Confirmation. In the Anglican Church only the bishop may confirm and ordain. In each case, the one receiving the episcopal laying on of hands and prayer is being placed in and given grace for an order of ministry and a vocation — lay or clerical. That is what makes Confirmation sacramental. TBAC addresses Confirmation in Questions 137-139, BCP pp. 59-60. We will review these topics briefly since we will spend a full session later on the Rite of Confirmation.

In summary:

Taken together, the three Sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation, and Holy Eucharist, are the sacramental rites of full incorporation into the Body of Christ.

Baptism is our initiation into the Body of Christ.

Holy Communion is our ongoing participation in the Body of Christ.

Confirmation is our strengthening and commissioning for service in the Body of Christ.

Now let’s briefly consider the remaining four sacraments: confession (absolution), ordination, marriage, and unction — anointing the sick or dying (To Be A Christian, Q 140 – 153).

SUMMARY

These seven sacraments are those recognized by and found in the Church. But they are an expression of a deeper truth and a part of the Anglican ethos: God is present in — not absent from — his creation and he works in and through it to minister grace to his people. In that broader sense, sacraments are numberless and abound everywhere: a timely word spoken, the touch of a hand, a certain slant of light, the aroma of incense, the cry of a baby. The sacramental worldview invites us to broaden our experience of God and our relationship with Him, by looking for him everywhere.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives

Session 6: Sacramental Theology and the Gospel Sacraments

APOSTLES ANGLICAN CHURCH
Fr. John A. Roop

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives
Session 6: Sacramental Theology and the Gospel Sacraments

The Lord be with you.
And with your spirit.

Let us pray.

The General Thanksgiving
Almighty God, Father of all mercies, we your unworthy servants give you humble thanks for all your goodness and loving-kindness to us and to all whom you have made. We bless you for our creation, preservation, and all the blessings of this life; but above all for your immeasurable love in the redemption of the world by our Lord Jesus Christ; for the means of grace, and for the hope of glory. And, we pray, give us such an awareness of your mercies, that with truly thankful hearts we may show forth your praise, not only with our lips, but in our lives, by giving up our selves to your service, and by walking before you in holiness and righteousness all our days; Through Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom, with you and the Holy Spirit, be honor and glory throughout all ages. Amen (BCP 2019, p. 25).

I selected this prayer, The General Thanksgiving, not only because it is good and right always and everywhere to offer our thanks to God, but specifically for the phrase “for the means of grace, and for the hope of glory.” One of the primary means of grace that God has given to the church is the sacraments, and the sacraments, which also offer us the hope of glory, are the topic of this session.

The Sacramental Worldview and the Nature of Sacraments

Let’s begin our reflection on the sacraments in what may seem an unlikely place: in Genesis 27, with the account of Isaac’s blessing of his sons Jacob and Esau. I will not read the entire text or recount the whole story. I will simply remind you that Jacob deceived his blind father Isaac and stole the patriarchal blessing of the firstborn from his brother Esau. I’ll pick up the text with the blessing and the reaction of Isaac and Esau upon learning of the deception.

[Genesis 27:1–38 (ESV): 27 When Isaac was old and his eyes were dim so that he could not see, he called Esau his older son and said to him, “My son”; and he answered, “Here I am.” 2 He said, “Behold, I am old; I do not know the day of my death. 3 Now then, take your weapons, your quiver and your bow, and go out to the field and hunt game for me, 4 and prepare for me delicious food, such as I love, and bring it to me so that I may eat, that my soul may bless you before I die.”

5 Now Rebekah was listening when Isaac spoke to his son Esau. So when Esau went to the field to hunt for game and bring it, 6 Rebekah said to her son Jacob, “I heard your father speak to your brother Esau, 7 ‘Bring me game and prepare for me delicious food, that I may eat it and bless you before the Lord before I die.’ 8 Now therefore, my son, obey my voice as I command you. 9 Go to the flock and bring me two good young goats, so that I may prepare from them delicious food for your father, such as he loves. 10 And you shall bring it to your father to eat, so that he may bless you before he dies.” 11 But Jacob said to Rebekah his mother, “Behold, my brother Esau is a hairy man, and I am a smooth man. 12 Perhaps my father will feel me, and I shall seem to be mocking him and bring a curse upon myself and not a blessing.” 13 His mother said to him, “Let your curse be on me, my son; only obey my voice, and go, bring them to me.”

14 So he went and took them and brought them to his mother, and his mother prepared delicious food, such as his father loved. 15 Then Rebekah took the best garments of Esau her older son, which were with her in the house, and put them on Jacob her younger son. 16 And the skins of the young goats she put on his hands and on the smooth part of his neck. 17 And she put the delicious food and the bread, which she had prepared, into the hand of her son Jacob.

18 So he went in to his father and said, “My father.” And he said, “Here I am. Who are you, my son?” 19 Jacob said to his father, “I am Esau your firstborn. I have done as you told me; now sit up and eat of my game, that your soul may bless me.” 20 But Isaac said to his son, “How is it that you have found it so quickly, my son?” He answered, “Because the Lord your God granted me success.” 21 Then Isaac said to Jacob, “Please come near, that I may feel you, my son, to know whether you are really my son Esau or not.” 22 So Jacob went near to Isaac his father, who felt him and said, “The voice is Jacob’s voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau.” 23 And he did not recognize him, because his hands were hairy like his brother Esau’s hands. So he blessed him. 24 He said, “Are you really my son Esau?” He answered, “I am.” 25 Then he said, “Bring it near to me, that I may eat of my son’s game and bless you.” So he brought it near to him, and he ate; and he brought him wine, and he drank.]

26 Then his father Isaac said to him, “Come near and kiss me, my son.” 27 So he came near and kissed him. And Isaac smelled the smell of his garments and blessed him and said,

“See, the smell of my son

is as the smell of a field that the Lord has blessed!

28  May God give you of the dew of heaven

and of the fatness of the earth

and plenty of grain and wine.

29  Let peoples serve you,

and nations bow down to you.

Be lord over your brothers,

and may your mother’s sons bow down to you.

Cursed be everyone who curses you,

and blessed be everyone who blesses you!”

30 As soon as Isaac had finished blessing Jacob, when Jacob had scarcely gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, Esau his brother came in from his hunting. 31 He also prepared delicious food and brought it to his father. And he said to his father, “Let my father arise and eat of his son’s game, that you may bless me.” 32 His father Isaac said to him, “Who are you?” He answered, “I am your son, your firstborn, Esau.” 33 Then Isaac trembled very violently and said, “Who was it then that hunted game and brought it to me, and I ate it all before you came, and I have blessed him? Yes, and he shall be blessed.” 34 As soon as Esau heard the words of his father, he cried out with an exceedingly great and bitter cry and said to his father, “Bless me, even me also, O my father!” 35 But he said, “Your brother came deceitfully, and he has taken away your blessing.” 36 Esau said, “Is he not rightly named Jacob? For he has cheated me these two times. He took away my birthright, and behold, now he has taken away my blessing.” Then he said, “Have you not reserved a blessing for me?” 37 Isaac answered and said to Esau, “Behold, I have made him lord over you, and all his brothers I have given to him for servants, and with grain and wine I have sustained him. What then can I do for you, my son?” 38 Esau said to his father, “Have you but one blessing, my father? Bless me, even me also, O my father.” And Esau lifted up his voice and wept.

This account raises some interesting questions.

(1) Why is Esau so upset that Isaac has given his blessing to Jacob? The blessing is, after all, just words spoken by an old man, isn’t it?

(2) What is the real problem? Can’t Isaac simply rescind his blessing to Jacob — it was, after all gotten deceitfully — and pronounce it over Esau, if that will make Esau feel better?

This might seem to be a non-issue to us, but for those in covenant with YHWH, it was not that simple. The presumption in this and similar texts is that the patriarchal blessing is not mere words, but rather is a speech-act, words that have power to accomplish what they express. As a modern example, consider the declaration of marriage. At some point during the marriage ceremony, the preacher, priest, justice of the peace, whoever is presiding, says something like, “According to the power vested in by … I now pronounce you husband and wife.” And those words, combined with the acts that have gone before — the taking of vows, the exchange of rings — affect/accomplish what they express; the man and woman really become husband and wife. That gives some insight into the patriarchal blessing as speech-act. It presumes that either (a) God will honor the words of the patriarch due to the covenant relationship between them, or (b) God is working through the patriarch to speak that which should be spoken and then will act through the words, in accordance with the words, to accomplish the words and thus to accomplish God’s will. Further, the implication in the text is that, once given, the blessing is irrevocable; once spoken, it cannot be rescinded. The outcome — if not the method of achieving it — was according to God’s will. God chose to, and did indeed, bless Jacob and not Esau.

This notion of speech-act and of God working through the words and actions of his servants to accomplish his will lies at the heart of sacramental theology.

God gives his church words to say, actions to perform, and physical matter to utilize so that in and through the words and actions and material he might act to minister grace to — to be present with and to bless — his people. These speech-acts of the church we call Sacraments.

As we explore Anglican sacramental theology, we will use the ACNA Catechism, To Be A Christian. According to this catechism, there are two Gospel or Dominical (of the Lord) Sacraments (Q 123) and five sacraments of the Church (Q 124). The distinction between the two categories of sacraments is a matter of definition based upon command, extent, and purpose.

(1) The Gospel Sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion are (a) commanded/instituted by Christ, (b) for everyone, and (c) generally required for salvation.

(2) The sacraments of the Church — confirmation, confession (absolution), ordination, marriage, and anointing of the sick/dying — (a) were not specifically commanded/instituted by Christ in the Gospels but rather were Apostolic or early church practices, (b) are not required for everyone, and (c) are not required for salvation.

Sometimes we speak of these two categories as the greater and lesser sacraments.

So, why are these seven identified as sacraments? What is a sacrament? According to Q 121:

A sacrament is an outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace. God gives the sign as a means whereby we receive that grace, and as a tangible assurance that we do in fact receive it (1662 Catechism).

We begin with the notion of outward sign. The sign is comprised of the words we say, the actions we perform, and the material we utilize in the sacrament. Broadly speaking, it it the speech part of the speech-act. It is through these words, actions, and material that God acts — the act part of speech-act — to minister grace to us and to assure us tangibly that we have received that grace.

To understand Anglican sacramental theology — which we share, at least in broad strokes, with the other historic churches (Orthodox and Roman Catholic) — some clarifications are essential.

[EXCURSUS: I should note here that there exists a spectrum of sacramental understanding in the Anglican Church. I would not presume to speak for all Anglicans. As C. S. Lewis described himself, I, too, am a rather ordinary, middle-of-the-road Anglican, neither particularly high church or low church, though I do take a rather “high view” of the sacraments that is called by some “Anglo-Catholic.” I suppose that is right. I am an Anglican, and I am part of the one, holy, catholic and Apostolic Church. I am attempting a faithful representation of sacramental theology rooted first in Scripture, then in the Book of Common Prayer 2019, and lastly in the ACNA Catechism. I leave the historical ins-and-outs for another time.]

A sacrament is not a mere symbol that something has already happened. Nor is it a mere sign that points toward something happening. A sacrament is efficacious; it is the means by and through which God acts — not a symbol of something, but the thing itself. Let’s consider two examples of this distinction briefly, and then explore them in greater depth later.

Are you familiar with the Sinner’s Prayer? It is a prayer of repentance in which someone turns toward Christ, confesses sin and asks for forgiveness, and acclaims Jesus as Lord and Savior. A version of it is even found in the ACNA Catechism, pp. 21-22. It was the culmination of the invitation at every Billy Graham Crusade. For many churches, this is the moment of one’s salvation. After that, one might be encouraged to be baptized as either (a) an outward sign that one has been saved and has made a commitment to Christ, and/or (b) an outward sign that one is affiliating with a particular denomination or congregation. There is no particular grace ministered by God in and through baptism; it is simply symbolic. This is non-sacramental theology; baptism may be described as an ordinance — something Christ said to do — but not as a sacrament, a means through which God acts. This is not the way Anglicans — following the great Tradition that runs through the ancient Church — consider baptism.

The second example concerns Holy Communion. In the faith expression in which I was raised — the Christian Church — Communion each Sunday was non-negotiable. We considered Communion an essential part of our faith and practice. And yet, it was not for us sacramental. We ate bread and drank grape juice (not wine) because Jesus commanded us to do so in memory of him. Communion was a memorial ordinance only. It might stir our hearts and strengthen our faith, but it had nothing to do with our salvation or with receiving grace from God. Bread was bread and grape juice was a symbol of wine, but nothing more. There was no thought of participating in the sacrifice of Christ, no concept of his real presence with us at the table, no realization of spiritually feasting on his Body and Blood. Communion was sign and symbol of something that had happened long ago, but it was not a Sacrament, not a means through which God acts in the present to minister grace.

I don’t say any of this to be dismissive of other expressions of the faith, but simply to explain the distinction between non-sacramental and sacramental worship. Anglicans worship sacramentally.

Gospel Sacraments

Now, let’s examine the two Gospel Sacraments more closely by looking, very briefly, at the Prayer Book services for Baptism and Holy Communion. They express our sacramental understanding of these rites.

Baptism
The outward form of baptism — the outward and visible signs of the Sacrament — are Word and water and often oil. We immerse or pour using water in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. Later we sign the newly baptized with the sign of the cross using chrism, oil blessed by the bishop. When we do these outward actions, God has promised to work an inward act of grace for the salvation of the one receiving baptism. The Exhortation (BCP 2019, p. 162) offers a summary of the grace received in and through baptism:

Dearly beloved, Scripture teaches that we were all dead in our sins and trespasses, but by grace we may be saved through faith. Our Savior Jesus Christ said, “Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God”; and he commissioned the Church to “make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” Here we ask our Heavenly Father that these Candidates, being baptized with water, may be filled with the Holy Sprit, born again, and received into the Church as living members of Christ’s body. Therefore, I urge you to call upon God the Father, through our Lord Jesus Christ, that of his abundant mercy he will grant to these Candidates that which by nature they cannot have.

Then, following the baptism, the Celebrant’s prayer thanks God for doing in the sacrament precisely what he promised to do in the sacrament:

Heavenly Father, we thank you that by water and the Holy Spirit you have bestowed upon these your servants the forgiveness of sin, received them as your own children by adoption, made them members of your holy Church, and raised them to the new life of grace. Sustain them, O Lord, in your Holy Spirit, that they may enjoy everlasting salvation through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen (BCP 169).

These two texts taken together proclaim baptismal grace as forgiveness of sin, indwelling of the Holy Spirit, new birth, adoption as children of God, and incorporation into Christ’s body, the Church. Two notes are essential here. First, baptism is not a symbol that this grace had been given previously, during the Sinner’s Prayer, for example; rather, baptism is the sacramental means and instrument through which this grace is given. Second, there is no distinction made between infants and adults. Infant baptism is not some “junior baptism” awaiting later completion; it is full baptism and results in full baptismal grace. For those who are concerned that an infant cannot express faith, I would reassure them that the Anglican Church — the Anglican Church in North America — requires a personal, mature profession of faith and provides for that in the sacrament of Confirmation — and also at the reaffirmation of baptismal vows at every baptism and at the Easter Vigil.

An important note about baptism that can be confusing to those coming to Anglicanism from a non-sacramental tradition: baptism is performed once and once only. There is no concept in the Great Tradition of re-baptism. As St. Paul writes to the Ephesian church:

Ephesians 4:4–6 (ESV): 4 There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call— 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.

If one was baptized in water in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, then one was/is baptized. If one subsequently left the faith and later wishes to return, that return is accomplished by confession and absolution, not by re-baptism. If someone comes to Anglicanism having been baptized in another Christian tradition, provided the baptism was triune in nature and water was used, that baptism is accepted. In cases where that is not certain, a conditional baptism is performed with the words:

If you are not already baptized, N., I baptize you in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit (BCP 2019, p. 173).

Holy Communion
The outward form for Holy Communion — the outward and visible signs — are Bread and Wine and the Words of Institution. We ask the Father to bless and sanctify, with his word and Holy Spirit, our gifts of bread and wine that we might partake of the most blessed body and blood of Jesus Christ our Lord, and God has promised to do just that.

Eucharistic theology is notoriously complex and vexed. My limited point here is simply that, whatever your understanding of real presence, Anglican Eucharistic theology is not memorialism; it is not that Holy Communion is a mere remembrance with symbols only. In Anglicanism, Holy Communion is sacramental. Hence the unfailing use of the Words of Institution in which Christ make clear that the bread — once taken and blessed — is his body and that the wine — once take and blessed — is his blood. We need postulate no “mechanism” of transformation. The Celebrant simply prays:

Sanctify them [the bread and wine] by your Word and Holy Spirit to be for your people the Body and Blood of your Son Jesus Christ (BCP 2019, p. 134).

Further, in the Prayer of Humble Access, all God’s people pray before receiving Holy Communion:

Grant us, therefore, gracious Lord,
so to eat the flesh of your dear Son Jesus Christ,
and so to drink his blood,
that our sinful bodies may be made clean by his body,
and our souls washed through his most precious blood (BCP 2019, p.135).

And then the elements are distributed with these, or similar, words:

The Body of our Lord Jesus Christ.

The Blood of our Lord Christ.

After the Words of Institution and the consecration of the bread and wine, the elements are no longer referred to as ordinary bread and wine, but rather as the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. We do not need to speculate on how the Holy Spirit makes this real to us; we need simply to accept it and partake.

As for the specific grace received in Holy Communion, the ACNA Catechism (pp. 58-59) notes:

134. What benefits do you receive through partaking of this sacrament?

As my body is nourished by the bread and wine, my soul is strengthened by the Body and Blood of Christ. I receive God’s forgiveness, and I am renewed in the love and unity of the Body of Christ, the Church.

There is more, much much, to be said, but this should suffice to establish the sacramental nature of Holy Communion.

Summary of Gospel Sacraments
We might consider the Gospel Sacraments as the sacraments of incorporation into the Body of Christ. Baptism is our birth and initiation into Christ, and Holy Communion is our ongoing participation in Christ. A child is born or adopted into a family (baptism) and then is continually nourished by that family into maturity (Communion).

Conclusion

Anglicanism is inherently sacramental, which means simply that our lives are dependent upon God’s grace mediated to us in speech-acts involving words and physical matter such as water, oil, bread, and wine. Sacraments are not magic; they are not ritual incantations that “force” God to respond in certain ways. Rather, they are the means that God himself has given us, through which he has promised to act for us and for our salvation. This understanding of sacraments is fundamental to the importance/centrality of the Church:

XIX. OF THE CHURCH

The visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful men, in the which the pure Word of God is preached, and the Sacraments be duly administered according to Christ’s ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same (BCP 2019, p. 779).

The visible Church is defined in terms of Word (Holy Scripture) and Sacrament, both of which are central to the life of faith.

Posted in Catechesis, Confirmation | Leave a comment

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives

Session 5: The Decalogue

APOSTLES ANGLICAN CHURCH
Fr. John A. Roop

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives
Session 5: The Decalogue (Ten Commandments)

The Lord be with you.
And with your spirit.

Let us pray.

A Prayer for Increase in the Love of God
O God, you have prepared for those who love you such good things as surpass our understanding: Pour into our hearts such love towards you, that we, loving you in all things and above all things, may obtain your promises, which exceed all that we can desire; through Jesus Christ our Lord; who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, for ever and ever. Amen.

Introduction

Let’s begin our discussion of the Decalogue with a passage from St. Paul that on first reading might seem to point us in a very different direction, away from the Ten Commandments:

Ephesians 2:1–3 (ESV): 2 And you were dead in the trespasses and sins 2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— 3 among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.

First, notice the condition of mankind, the three slaveries which held us all enthralled: death, sin, and the dominion of the fallen powers over us. These correspond to the three falls of man in Genesis 3-11: the fall of Adam (death), the fall of Cain (sin as a power), and the fall at Babel (the rule of the fallen powers). We were all enslaved to this unholy trinity. Is there any hope, any possibility of rescue and freedom? St. Paul continues:

Ephesians 2:4–9 (ESV): 4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, 5 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— 6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7 so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast.

Yes, there is hope, and it lies with God’s initiative toward us in and through Jesus. Jesus’ death — to which we are united in baptism — tramples down death by death and frees us from that enemy. His death serves also as the “full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction, for the sins of the whole world” (BCP 2019, Holy Eucharist: Anglican Standard Text, p. 116). In his resurrection he seated us in the heavenly places with him; that is, he broke the dominion of the powers over us and made us citizens of the Kingdom of God.

How is it that we participate in this great act of deliverance? How do we access it? St. Paul is clear:

Ephesians 2:8–9 (ESV): 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast.

This rescue is a gift of God; our part is simply to receive it through faith. St. Paul makes clear that it is not a result of human works. We cannot, through our own righteous works, make God indebted to us, so that he must pay us salvation as the wage for work we have done. And, when St. Paul talks of works, he is nodding toward the works of obedience to the Law of Moses. He does this for two reasons: (1) to declare to the Jews that salvation is not through Moses but through Jesus, and (2) to declare to both Jews and Gentiles alike that Gentiles do not need to submit to all the demands of the Mosaic Law to follow Christ.

Because of St. Paul’s insistence on the primacy and sufficiency of faith, some accused him of antinomianism, of being a spiritual anarchist by teaching against the Law. You even see some of that confusion in the Church, not least in the Corinthian and the Roman correspondence. But, nothing was further from the truth (see, for example, Romans 6:1-14) as St. Paul makes clear in the last verse of the Ephesians passage we’ve been considering:

Ephesians 2:10 (ESV): 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

So, how do we integrate these notions? We are not saved — not delivered from death, sin, and the fallen powers — by our own works of righteousness. But now, having been saved, having been delivered by grace through faith we are free to lead lives of righteousness, to walk in the good works that God has prepared for us. St. Paul goes so far as to say that we have been created in Christ Jesus for that very purpose, for good works. We have been set free from death, sin, and the powers so that we might be free to do works of righteousness. It is in this sense that the moral aspects of the Law still have meaning for Christians in defining the good works that we are now free to do, empowered by the Spirit. So, the Church has always held that the core of the Law as summarized in the Decalogue is still binding on disciples of Christ and, in fact, represents a “floor” and not a “ceiling” of Christian righteousness. As Jesus said:

Matthew 5:17–20 (ESV): 17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

With the encouragement of St. Paul and of Jesus himself, we turn now to the Decalogue.

The Decalogue

There is a structure to the Decalogue that is important theologically and mnemonically. The commandments fall into two categories — obligations to God and obligations to our neighbors — hence Jesus’ summary of the Law as love for God and love for neighbor. The first four commandments pertain to God. The fifth commandment is a transition between obligations to God and neighbor. The last five commandments pertain to neighbor. Within each of the two categories, there is a progression from most fundamental to derivative commandments. For example, unless we have established the most fundamental right of a person to life (You shall not commit murder.) it makes no sense to talk about the property rights of the individual (You shall not steal.): first things first in each category.

With that, we turn to the Decalogue itself (BCP 2019, pp. 100-101):

I. I am the Lord your God.
You shall have no other gods but me.

II. You shall not make for yourself any idol.

III. You shall not take the Name of the Lord your God in vain.

IV. Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.

V. Honor your father and your mother.

VI. You shall not murder.

VII. You shall not commit adultery.

VIII. You shall not steal.

IX. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

X. You shall not covet.

Commandment I

The first category of commandments, I-IV, pertain to God. We start with this notion: there are other gods which might be, are are, worshipped. But, they are false gods, and they are not for us. St. Paul writes this to the Corinthians as they grapple with the propriety of eating meat offered to idols:

1 Corinthians 8:4–6 (ESV): 4 Therefore, as to the eating of food offered to idols, we know that “an idol has no real existence,” and that “there is no God but one.” 5 For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords”— 6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.

There are many gods and many lords, but not for us. For us there is one God, the Father, and one Lord, Jesus Christ.

In what sense are there many gods and many lords? Let’s approach this not objectively for the moment, but subjectively. One’s god is one’s ultimate good, that to which all other things are relativized or subjected. It is the focal point of one’s life and that to which all else, if necessary, will be sacrificed. Given that understanding of god, what are some gods that people are tempted to worship?

Pleasure, Power, Wealth, Honor (possessions, power, possessions, pride): the god of self. These four send out tendrils everywhere to make lesser gods of family, work/success, security, autonomy, community, . The fundamental challenge this commandment presents was summarized by St. Benedict this way: Prefer nothing to Christ. And that is why this commandment is the most fundamental; it is both the most important and the most far reaching.

Commandment II

In part because idols and their worshippers are mocked in Scripture we have, perhaps, a naive and literalistic view of them: a piece of wood or stone or wrought metal — an inanimate object — worshipped as if it were living and powerful. But, the ancient idol worshippers knew better; they were more sophisticated than that. The statue, if it were a statue, did not exhaust the nature of the god, but was only one hypostasis (personification), one instantiation of the god. So, for example, take the Egyptian god Ra (or Re). Ra is associated with the sun, so that the visible sun was considered one personification of Ra. But, since Ra was also associated with the divine rule of the pharaohs, the reigning pharaoh was another personification of Ra. And, the statues of the falcon-headed man with the sun-disk headdress was yet another personification. Behind them all lay the power of the god Ra. And that is the essence of idolatry: the attempt to control the power of the god that lies behind any visible image or manifestation of the god by worship and ritual. This is what St. Paul refers to in his warnings against idolatry:

1 Corinthians 10:14–21 (ESV): 14 Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say. 16 The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? 17 Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread. 18 Consider the people of Israel: are not those who eat the sacrifices participants in the altar? 19 What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? 20 No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons. 21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.

The idols — the stone, wood, or metal — are nothing at all. But behind them are the demons, and the demons have power. Worship of idols is an attempt to control the power of the demons and bend it to human will. That is essential to understand: idolatry is worship of demons with the intent of controlling their power for personal gain.

We are never tempted to do that are we? Well, what about the near worship of a political candidate or party? What about hyper-zealous devotion to a cause? What about money, which Jesus identifies as the god named mammon? What about occultism in all its obvious and subtle forms? What about addiction to technology, including bio-engineering technology that promises near endless life or even transhumanism? Here’s the really question we need to ask: what are we sacrificing ourselves to in order to harness and control its power for our benefit? Are we giving to this that which belongs only to God? If so, we have made for ourselves an idol.

Commandment III

I grew up under the impression that taking God’s name in vain meant a very particular type of cursing, invoking God’s name in a damning way. That is probably more crude than blasphemous — something to be avoided, but probably not so much what the commandment is about. St. Paul identifies the real problem in Romans:

Romans 2:17–24 (ESV): 17 But if you call yourself a Jew and rely on the law and boast in God 18 and know his will and approve what is excellent, because you are instructed from the law; 19 and if you are sure that you yourself are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, 20 an instructor of the foolish, a teacher of children, having in the law the embodiment of knowledge and truth— 21 you then who teach others, do you not teach yourself? While you preach against stealing, do you steal? 22 You who say that one must not commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples? 23 You who boast in the law dishonor God by breaking the law. 24 For, as it is written, “The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.”

The Jews were to be a light to the nations, a holy people, a kingdom of priests because they bore the name of God. By their faithfulness and disobedience — by their unrighteousness — they did not bring glory to the name of God but rather caused the Gentiles to blaspheme. The Jews took the name of God in vain.

Now, here is the challenge to us. We have taken on ourselves the name of God, because we bear the name of Christ. That means that everything we do, we do in the name of Jesus. I tell the truth in the name of Jesus; I lie in the name of Jesus. I forgive in the name Jesus; I take revenge in the name of Jesus. I act humbly in the name of Jesus; I am filled with pride in the name of Jesus. I love in the name of Jesus; I hate in the name of Jesus. You get the idea. By my actions — and the thoughts of my heart — I will either bring honor to the name of Jesus or I will take his name in vain. The truth is that I do both; I thank God for the former and repent of the latter. This commandment is a good check on our behavior. Before doing or saying something, we simply need to ask: Can I do this in the name of Jesus or will it be using his name in vain?

Commandment IV

Remember the Sabbath Day and keep it holy. As far as the Jewish authorities were concerned, Jesus observed this commandment mainly in its breach; he held to the Sabbath restrictions very loosely and, in their interpretation, often violated it. A typical example of this, and of the authorities’ response, is found in St. John’s Gospel in which Jesus heals a disabled man at the Pool of Bethesda:

John 5:15–18 (ESV): 15 The man went away and told the Jews that it was Jesus who had healed him. 16 And this was why the Jews were persecuting Jesus, because he was doing these things on the Sabbath. 17 But Jesus answered them, “My Father is working until now, and I am working.”

18 This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

Now, before we draw any great conclusions about this Sabbath from this, let’s lay another Gospel account alongside it:

Luke 4:16 (ESV): 16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and he stood up to read.

It was Jesus’ custom to go to the synagogue on the Sabbath. That is part of what got him in trouble; he was in the synagogue with the Jewish authorities!

From these two accounts we can reason what Jesus would have meant by remembering the Sabbath Day and keeping it holy: (1) gathering with God’s people for worship and (2) doing the work of God, i.e., the work that God is constantly doing and giving us to do in his name.

About the former — gathering with God’s people for worship — I have little to say beyond this: go to Church on Sunday and make worship of God with the people of God your first priority as a firstfruits offering of time, attention, and love. That is a low but essential bar for Christian faith and practice.

About the latter — doing the work of God — I think more must be said. First, I would call attention to another Gospel text, this one from Matthew:

Matthew 12:9–14 (ESV): 9 He went on from there and entered their synagogue. 10 And a man was there with a withered hand. And they asked him, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”—so that they might accuse him. 11 He said to them, “Which one of you who has a sheep, if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not take hold of it and lift it out? 12 Of how much more value is a man than a sheep! So it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.” 13 Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” And the man stretched it out, and it was restored, healthy like the other. 14 But the Pharisees went out and conspired against him, how to destroy him.

Note again where Jesus is on the Sabbath: in the synagogue worshipping. That is his first work; the second is an act of healing. By way of explanation, he say, “So it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.” And these two must but the pillars of our Sabbath observance: worship and doing good.

What falls under the umbrella of good Sabbath work? There is no exhaustive list, of course, but we might start with Matthew 25 as jumping off place:

Matthew 25:31–36 (ESV): 31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, 36 I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’

In the Roman Catholic Church these are known as the corporal works of mercy, the ones that are enumerated in Matthew 25 with two additional works:

Feed the hungry.

Give drink to the thirsty.

Welcome the stranger (shelter the homeless).

Clothe the naked.

Visit the sick and imprisoned.

Bury the dead.

Give alms to the poor.

Take these in the broadest possible sense. Let me give an example or two: taking a Sunday meal to a shut-in; taking warm clothes and blankets to a KARM warming center on a frigid Sunday afternoon; sitting with a worried family member in the surgical waiting room Sunday evening. Worship and do good; this is how we remember the Sabbath Day and keep it holy.

Commandment V: The Transitional Commandment

Thus far we have focused on our obligations to God. Now we transition to our obligations to our neighbor — to everyone. But, between God and our neighbor, there is a special category of people: our parents. Similar to God, they created and sustained us. Similar to neighbor, they are human beings who may be honored but not worshipped. How can we worship God whom we have not seen, if cannot honor our parents whom we have seen? What does that look like? Let me offer two texts and then some comments.

Ephesians 6:1–3 (ESV): 6 Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 “Honor your father and mother” (this is the first commandment with a promise), 3 “that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land.”

1 Timothy 5:8 (ESV): 8 But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

For children, honor looks like obedience, provided what the parents command is “in the Lord.” For adult children this obedience might take the form of respectful consideration. But it also means providing for parents’ financial, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs. One cannot claim to be a follower of Christ and fail to provide — as he is able — for his parents.

This is challenging: not just because of our own selfishness and willfulness, but also because of the complexity of some situations we find ourselves in, not least as our parents age. Suppose one’s mother — a widow — is no longer able to live alone but is very resistant to leaving her home. What does honoring her look like: providing live in care; moving her to your home; placing her in a skilled care facility? And there are economic and logistical considerations to all this. No, it is never easy, but the goal is always the same: to find a way to appropriately honor our parents as fitting in the Lord. I would suggest that we can, and should, extend a similar, but more limited, kind of honor to all elders and especially to our fathers and mothers in the faith. St. Paul says as much to both Timothy and Titus concerning their relationships with their chronological elders and with spiritual elders in the congregation.

Commandment VI

You shall not murder. The right to life is the most fundamental one granted by God. God calls a man into existence and his life belongs to God; it does not belong to another to take life. That is, in part, why the Church has always considered abortion to be sinful, a violation of this commandment. Yet, even with this straightforward commandment there are great complexities because we live in a fallen world that thrusts moral ambiguity on us. May a police officer use deadly force to stop the commission of a violent crime? May Christians take up arms in military conflict? May a Christian use deadly force for self-defense or for defense of another? Do any of these constitute “murder” — which is forbidden — or merely killing which is not specifically addressed. Thanks be to God, most of us will never face these complex cases, nor will we be in a position where murder is a viable option or temptation for us.

But, that does not mean we are off the hook with this commandment: not at all.

Matthew 5:21–24 (ESV): 21 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ 22 But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire. 23 So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.

Jesus internalizes the commandment, makes it about the heart. Murder is about anger, condemnation, and hostility. So, for the Christian, this commandment becomes:

You shall not nurse your anger.

You shall not condemn or slander your brother.

You shall pursue reconciliation.

These are the issues that we face more than we care to admit, and they are challenging enough for us. You shall not murder starts with being at peace with all men as much as it lies in our power.

Commandment VII

You shall not commit adultery. This is the one commandment that applies only to a specific group — those who are married — though reasonably it might be extended to address all kinds of sexual immorality. I am going to limit my discussion to marital infidelity because I think something more basic than sexual morality lies at the heart of this commandment: covenantal faithfulness. How can we be faithful to our baptismal covenant with God when we cannot be faithful to our marriage covenant with our spouse?

That means that adultery is not merely a matter of sexual infidelity, but a matter of infidelity to one’s marriage vows. In the Anglican Church we use these vows, and no others!

In the Name of God, I, N., take you to be my wife/husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better for worse, for richer for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish, until we are parted by death, according to God’s holy Word. This is my solemn vow (BCP 2019, p. 205).

So, those of us who are married dare not grow smug or complacent about this commandment simply because we have not had sex outside our marriage. The question is more fundamental: have I been faithful to my vows, made before God? And that is a choice we make day by day, until we are parted by death.

Add to that Jesus’ own intensification of the commandment, and you see the rigor of it:

Matthew 5:27–28 (ESV): “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.“

Commandments VIII and X

You shall not steal. You shall not covet.

Stealing is taking something — tangible or intangible — that doesn’t belong to you. I can steal your wallet and I can steal your reputation. I can steal your virtue and I can steal your identity. I can steal my employer’s money or I can steal my employer’s time. The list of things I can steal is vast, but this commandment prohibits stealing anything at all, tangible or intangible.

Coveting is a bit different, though I think of it as the entryway to stealing, the first step along the path as it were. Where there is first no coveting, there will be no theft. One of the best examples of coveting comes from a Rick Springsteen song released in 1981: Jessie’s Girl. Listen to the first stanza:

Jessie is a friend
Yeah, I know he’s been a good friend of mine
But lately something’s changed that ain’t hard to define
Jessie’s got himself a girl and I want to make her mine

To covet is not simply to want something. If the person in the song, seeing how happy Jessie was, wanted to find himself a girlfriend — no problem, no coveting. The problem is that he wants Jessie’s girl, that he is so envious of Jessie that he wants to deprive Jessie of something important to him. Coveting is not simply me want something generally, but specifically me wanting the thing you have and wanting you not to have it. Coveting always posits a zero sum game: I can only win if you lose, and I am quite willing for you to lose. That is why I say coveting is the first step of stealing: I want what you have and I am quite happy to deprive you of it. If we refuse to covet, intentional theft will never be a problem.

There is a remedy to both covetousness and theft: contentment. Our consumerist culture is designed around stoking discontent and desire. We counter that with the Christian virtues of contentment with what God has provided us, with thanksgiving for it, and with confidence that God will, in the future, provide all that we truly need if we seek first his kingdom.

Commandment IX

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

This is more than just telling a lie about someone though it certainly includes lying and failing to make reparations for a lie. It also includes such sins as:

Knowingly deceiving another by providing misleading information or by withholding needed information. (Well, I didn’t exactly lie…)

Gossiping or failing to speak out to stop gossip.

Presuming the worst of another or making rash judgments.

Acting on prejudice.

Betraying another’s confidence.

We could add others, but this should be sufficient to spark your own thought.

Conclusion

We are called to good works, not as a prerequisite for our salvation, but as the fruit of it. We are called to cultivate virtue, not to gain merit before God, but to grow into the likeness of our Lord Jesus Christ. We are, as the Jews were before us, called to be a holy people — saints — and a kingdom of priests to God our Father. The Decalogue, taken broadly as we have tried to do, gives us an insight into what those good works look like, what it means to be virtuous, and how to move toward holiness. The Decalogue is a good place to begin our self-assessment, to monitor our progress, and to prompt our repentance.

Posted in Catechesis, Confirmation | Leave a comment

Elders and Priests

I pass along the following book excerpt not intending to aggrandize priests — though certainly to encourage them — but rather to exalt Christ and to exhort my brothers and sisters in Christ to treasure, through participation, the Sacraments (Mysteries) of the Church. The author contrasts Orthodox elders (like St. Paisios), who often have charismatic, wonder-working gifts, with average parish priests and wonders, what good is a priest by comparison. His answer follows:

Initially, I would look at the priests of the Church with doubts and suspicion. “Father Paisios is a saint and has many spiritual gifts,” I would tell myself, “but what kind of spiritual power does an average, overweight parish priest have? Can he really grant spiritual gifts like the elder, or is he in fact an entirely lesser person?” The answers to these questions were given me in time, when I once received Holy Communion amidst a large crowd in an average parish church.

I had fasted, gone to Confession, and said my prayers before Communion as usual, but this time, when the priest placed Holy Communion in my mouth, I felt Christ Himself flooding my entire being, body and soul. Christ the Creator united Himself more intimately and more deeply with me, the work of His hands, than is possible for two people in this world to be united. People are physically separated by the boundaries of their own skin. Even an embryo is separated from its mother by the wall of its newly forming skin. Christ, however, became one with me on a deeper level, in a unique union. His Blood literally merged with my blood; His body literally was fused to my body, so that my hands, my feet, my eyes, and all the other parts of my body had become members of the Body of Christ.

His heartwarming peace pervaded my entire soul, making it leap for joy in a state of wonder. After the passage of so many centuries — and after I had committed so many sins — Christ God ineffably condescended to come and palpably dwell within me, making me for a short while a God-bearer. I was in awe at His manifest presence in my mind, soul, and body. It was beyond my comprehension how this took place, but I knew then that such a union with Christ was possible and always would be.

I was so moved that I was no longer about to remain standing. So, I went to my place, where I tried to hold back the sweet tears of joy at being one with Christ, Whose great love had bridged the ontological gap separating divine and human nature. Nearly two thousand years ago, our sweetest Lord Jesus declared, He that eateth My Flesh, and drinketh My Blood, dwelleth in Me, and I in him. And lo, on this day, my union with God was the personal, yet unfathomable, fulfillment of those words. And once more, Christ tells us for all time why He condescends to be united with us in the Mystery: Whoso eateth My Flesh and drinketh My Blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. Looking towards the last day and eternal life, Christ loves us so much that He gave us this great offering, because He desires for us to become like Him even in His divinity, living with Him for all eternity.

An all-consuming love for all of us, in every generation, led God the Word to become man, to call us His friends and brethren, to open the way towards theosis with His Resurrection, and to freely and bountifully offer Himself to us at every Divine Liturgy. Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and forever, as perfect God wrought all things in perfection. That is, Christ brought to completion the work of man’s salvation once and for all, so that there would be no need for supplements, corrections, or adjustments with the passage of time. The life-giving and effective Mysteries that Christ instituted have been present in the Church for two thousand years, granting eternal life to the faithful. And, at the last day, those who recognized this life-giving path but neglected to follow it will be without defense.

This experience made me realize the truth of the Church’s teachings: Christ is the Head of the Church, the Fountain of her life, and the Center of her sacramental worship. With the descent of the Holy Spirit, the Church was gathered under the auspices of the Apostles whom Christ had sanctified to be the ministers of His Mysteries. Through ordination to the priesthood, this special blessing to celebrate the Mysteries of Christ was passed down to the priests of the Church from generation to generation without break or interruption.

A priest can celebrate the Mysteries of the Diving Liturgy without being a saint, but a saint who is not a priest cannot do so. Elder Paisios, for example, who was not a priest, could not celebrate the Mysteries of Christ, even if he could work a thousand miracles. He would bend his holy neck under the priest’s stole for the Mystery of Confession, and would wait with yearning for the priest to celebrate the Divine Liturgy so that he could commune. Like a nursing child receiving life from his mother’s milk, so the elder received life from the divine grace of the Mysteries of the Church, the mother of all Christians (Dionysios Farasiotis, The Gurus, the Young Man, and Elder Paisios, St, Herman of Alaska Brotherhood (2008), pp. 288-290).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives

Session 4: The Lord’s Prayer

APOSTLES ANGLICAN CHURCH
Fr. John A. Roop

Christian Essentials / Anglican Distinctives
Session 4: The Lord’s Prayer

The Lord be with you.
And with your spirit.

Let us pray.

For the Spirit of Prayer
Almighty God, you pour out on all who desire it the spirit of grace and of supplication: Deliver us, when we draw near to you, from coldness of heart and wandering of mind, that with steadfast thoughts and kindled affections we may worship you in spirit and in truth; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen (BCP 2019, p. 647).

And now as our Savior Christ has taught us, we are bold to pray:

Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed by thy Name, thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread.

And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.

For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever and ever.

Amen.

Introduction and History
Luke 11:1–4 (ESV): 11 Now Jesus was praying in a certain place, and when he finished, one of his disciples said to him, “Lord, teach us to pray, as John taught his disciples.” 2 And he said to them, “When you pray, say:

“Father, hallowed be your name.
Your kingdom come.
3  Give us each day our daily bread,
4  and forgive us our sins,
for we ourselves forgive everyone who is indebted to us.
And lead us not into temptation.”

This, Luke 11:1-4, is one of the contexts in which the Lord’s Prayer is presented in the Gospels; the other is in the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 6:5-13. The timing and setting of the two presentations are different, as is the exact wording of the prayer. Matthew’s version is longer, and it is the one we use liturgically, though even there we add the doxology (For thine is the kingdom, etc.) that is not actually part of the prayer proper.

For a moment, I would like us to consider the context of the Lukan account. In it, the disciples ask Jesus to teach them to pray. Why might they have done that? From the text, we get these possible reasons.

1. Jesus was devoted to prayer and the witness of his example led the disciples to ask. Jesus prayer, and they wanted to pray like him.

2. Their request may represent the disciples’ desire for “continuity with distinction” in the ministries of John the Baptist and Jesus. In continuity with John, Jesus’ disciples want him to teach them to pray as John was doing for his disciples. In distinction, they likely wanted a unique prayer from Jesus to set them apart from John’s disciples.

And these are still good reasons for us to make the Lord’s Prayer our own: Jesus was a person of prayer and this was the particular prayer that he gave his disciples and that they passed on to the Church.

But did Jesus actually expect his disciples to memorize this prayer and repeat it verbatim? The church of my youth certainly thought not. I was raised in the Christian Church, an outgrowth of the American Restoration Movement which was itself part of the Second Great Awakening (1790-1840). The churches which came from this movement — the Disciples of Christ, the Christian Church, and the Churches of Christ — tend toward a certain American brand of Puritanism, a rejection of that which was not specifically mandated in Scripture. These churches tend to be non-liturgical (a-liturgical) and non-sacramental. In my congregation, we never said the Lord’s Prayer together. The minister I had for the greatest part of my four decades there — may his memory be blessed — would not even refer to that prayer as the Lord’s Prayer. The Lord’s Prayer, he insisted, was the prayer that Jesus himself offered to the Father as recorded in John 17 (sometimes referred to as the High Priestly Prayer). He — echoing the emphasis of the Restoration Movement — called the “Our Father” the “Model Prayer.” Do you see what that implies and what the consequences of that name change might be? We never said the Lord’s Prayer corporately in worship, nor was its use ever advocated for private prayer and devotion. Rather than using the actual words of the prayer, we were encouraged to consider it a model of prayer to guide us in formulating our own, personal prayers. The prayer was not to be said verbatim, but rather to be used only loosely as a template for our own prayers.

So, was my preacher right? Well, yes and no. He was right in saying that the Lord’s Prayer offers a good model for prayer. Even C. S. Lewis used it as a springboard for his own, personal prayer. But, he was not right — and I say that with great reverence and respect — he was not right to insist that the church was not intended to use the prayer liturgically, verbatim. As early as the late first century or early second century — and probably from the very beginning — some churches were already using the Prayer verbatim as recorded in the Didache, an early church manual:

8:1 And do not keep your fasts with the hypocrites. For they fast on Monday and Thursday; but you should fast on Wednesday and Friday. 2 Nor should you pray like the hypocrites, but as the Lord commanded in his gospel, you should pray as follows: “Our Father in heaven, may your name be kept holy, may your kingdom come, may your will be done on earth as in heaven. Give us today our daily bread [Or: the bread that we need; or: our bread for tomorrow]. And forgive us our debt, as we forgive our debtors. And do not bring us into temptation but deliver us from the evil one [Or: from evil]. For the power and the glory are yours forever.” 3 Pray like this three times a day (Bart D. Ehrman, ed., The Apostolic Fathers (Volume 1), Harvard University Press (2003), pp.429-430).

The Lord’s Prayer has been central to the prayer of the Church from the beginning. We can certainly pray it in Jesus’ name because it is the prayer he gave us. We can be certain that this prayer fully reflects the will of God, because God the Son commended it to us. If you do not yet have a fixed rule of prayer, I suggest that you start with this: pray the Lord’s Prayer three times each day — morning, noon, and evening, perhaps before rising, at lunch, and immediately before retiring. If you already have a rule of prayer that doesn’t include the Lord’s Prayer with this frequency, you might consider adding that to your rule.

Content of the Lord’s Prayer

Our Father, who art in heaven
Let’s begin with an important question: for whom is this prayer intended? That is, who can offer it fully and with authenticity? The salutation gives the answer: Our Father. This prayer is given to all those who can authentically call God “Father.” As to who these people are, St. John makes that clear in the Prologue to his Gospel:

John 1:9–13 (ESV): 9 The true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him. 11 He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him. 12 But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, 13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.

With this, St. Paul agrees as he writes in Ephesians:

Ephesians 1:3–6 (ESV): 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, 6 to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved.

And just one more reference — another from St. John — this time with an addition:

1 John 3:1–3 (ESV): 3 See what kind of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God; and so we are. The reason why the world does not know us is that it did not know him. 2 Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is. 3 And everyone who thus hopes in him purifies himself as he is pure.

This prayer is given to those who have been born from above — or born again as Jesus tells Nicodemus — through faith in Jesus and baptism in his name. There is also the expectation that such people — the children of God — will be leading lives of repentance, engaged in purification. We are sons and daughters of the Father to the extent that we share the family resemblance, or to the extent that we are seeking and growing into that resemblance. These are the people to whom this prayer is given, the people who can pray it authentically.

Notice that the salutation is not “My Father,” but “Our Father.” Christian faith — and Christian prayer — is always personal (important to the “individual”) but it is never private because we are part of the corporate body of Christ. This dynamic even plays out in the Creeds. We use the Apostles Creeds as the baptismal confession of faith. It uses the first person singular pronoun, I: I believe. In doing so, it acknowledges that you are not yet a member of the body of Christ, but rather are in the state of becoming that. You are speaking for yourself, declaring your fidelity to the group to which you do not yet belong. But, when we affirm our faith in the words of the Nicene Creed at the Eucharist — the family meal which is given only to the baptized, the members of the family — we do so using the first person plural pronoun, We: We believe. Our faith is precisely that: our faith. It is personal to us as was our baptism. But it is shared, not private, as is the Eucharist, and as is the Lord’s Prayer: Our Father. When we pray, even if alone, we always pray with and for the Church. You gather up the prayers of all your brothers and sisters when you pray in the words Christ gave us, and you are gathered up in their prayers when they pray. “Our Father” is an expression of that, a reminder that we are not alone, that by virtue of our common Father we are brothers and sisters praying with and for one another.

We pray to our Father who art in heaven. In speaking about heaven, I am forced to resort to a type of theological expression that we in the West use only infrequently, but which is common in Eastern Christianity: apophatic theology. In apophatic theology we say not what a thing is — because it beggars our power to express it well and fully — but rather what a thing is not. I can’t tell you what heaven is because every positive statement I make about it is partial and misleading. So, I can say that whatever heaven is, it is not a physical place far away where God is sequestered. Isaiah says this:

Isaiah 66:1 (ESV): 66 Thus says the Lord:

“Heaven is my throne,
and the earth is my footstool;
what is the house that you would build for me,
and what is the place of my rest?

Throne and footstool: those two are nearby and connected, not far away and disengaged. Somehow heaven and earth — the spiritual reality and the physical reality — intersect so that, as the Orthodox Christians pray:

O Heavenly King, Comforter, Spirit of Truth who art everywhere present and fillest all things, Treasury of good things and Giver of life: come and abide in us, and cleanse us from every sin, and save our souls, O Good One.

I am going to offer this not because I think it is right — I know it is deficient in many ways — but because it’s the best I can do at this moment. I think of heaven as the life and presence of God which is everywhere, which fills all things, but which is made manifest to us in various ways and in various times. The angels and archangels, the cherubim and seraphim, the apostles and saints and martyrs are always “in” heaven because they are always caught up into the life and presence of God. Some day, please God, that will be our experience, too. But, even now we glimpse heaven, we are caught up into heaven: in the Eucharist when we share the Wedding Supper of the Lamb with angels and archangels and with all the company of heaven, with the real presence of Jesus Christ; in “thin places” of silence and worship where the Lord’s presence is palpable; in reading the Word of God when the Holy Spirit reveals Jesus to us; and, not least, when we pray — when we pray the Lord’s Prayer because in and through that prayer, through the intercession of Jesus our Great High Priest, we come boldly before the throne of grace.

…hallowed be thy Name
And what do we do first when caught up into heaven through this prayer? We say, “Hallowed be thy Name.” Hallowed” stems from the same root word as holy, sanctified, saintly (αγιομς). This is an act of praise: we are exalting the Name of God, which is an expression of his essence — as glorious above all, as supremely good, as of the highest worth. But, even as we do that, it is important to keep in mind the words of another prayer, The General Thanksgiving:

And, we pray, give us such an awareness of your mercies,
that with truly thankful hearts
we may show forth your praise,
not only with our lips, but in our lives,
by giving up our selves to your service,
and by walking before you
in holiness and righteousness all our days (BCP 2019, p. 25).

In praying “Hallowed be thy Name,” we are asking God to use us as the instruments/agents through which honor and praise will accrue to him and to his name. And that will be true only if the witness of our lives match the words of our lips. So, this is both praise and commitment.

…thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.
I take this as an example of the Jewish poetic device of parallelism. You see it most frequently in the Psalms, in a couplet of lines where the first line makes a statement and the second line re-emphasizes it is slightly different form.

Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly,*
nor stood in the way of sinners, and has not sat in the seat of the scornful (Ps 1:1).

Why do the nations so furiously rage together?*
And why do the people devise a vain thing (Ps 2:1)?

And, in the prayer we have:

Thy kingdom come,
thy will be done,
on earth / as it is in heaven.

I see these petitions as parallel so that the kingdom of God comes whenever and wherever God’s will is done. Every act of true worship, every act of obedience, every act of sacrificial love, every act of mercy and compassion and forgiveness, is an inbreaking of the kingdom of God. Of course, the Church should be the earthly locus of this, the center from which radiates outward the kingdom of God so that God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven. But the Church is not commensurate with — not exhaustively identical to — the kingdom of God. The kingdom is manifest in unlikely places and through unlikely people. There is an interesting passage in St. Luke’s Gospel that gets at this:

Luke 9:49–50 (ESV): 49 John answered, “Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he does not follow with us.” 50 But Jesus said to him, “Do not stop him, for the one who is not against you is for you.”

Since only the power of God can cast out demons, this exorcist, though not a disciple of Jesus, was being used by God to manifest God’s will; each exorcism was a manifestation of God’s will on earth as in heaven. So, we should rejoice whenever we see God’s will being done, even by someone who is hostile to us and to our faith. God is up to something there. The kingdom of God is near and is being manifest. Good. That is what we want and what we pray for. Perhaps, as Jesus said from time to time, the person doing the will of God is not far from the kingdom of God.

In an ultimate sense, when we pray for the kingdom of God on earth as in heaven, we are praying for the redemption and restoration of all things in and through the Lord Jesus Christ: for Romans 8 and for Revelation 21-22 to come to be. As we say often, there is a sense of already but not yet is this petition. The kingdom of God is already breaking into this world, but it is not yet fully present. So, we pray for this present moment, that God’s will be done in and through us, and we pray for that future moment when God’s kingdom will arrive on the last, great day.

Give us this day our daily bread.
Next in the Prayer comes the only material petition, that is, the only petition related specifically to our physical needs: Give us this day our daily bread. This petition harkens back to the Exodus and to God’s provision of manna in the wilderness.

Exodus 16:4–5 (ESV): 4 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Behold, I am about to rain bread from heaven for you, and the people shall go out and gather a day’s portion every day, that I may test them, whether they will walk in my law or not. 5 On the sixth day, when they prepare what they bring in, it will be twice as much as they gather daily.”

Each day, God provided for each person his daily bread, just enough for that day, or in the case of the sixth day, enough for that day and the Sabbath to follow. It was not possible to gather more and hoard it, to try to corner the market on manna and make a profit by selling to those who needed more. Why not? Because everyone had enough: the ones who gathered little and the ones who gathered much. And, what happened if manna were stored for tomorrow? It bred worms and stank (Ex 16:20). Give us this day our daily manna, but not tomorrow’s today.

And then there is Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount which occurs right after his teaching on prayer:

Matthew 6:19–21 (ESV): 19 “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, 20 but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. 21 For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

Matthew 6:25 (ESV): 25 “Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing?

Matthew 6:32–34 (ESV): 32 For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

34 “Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.

Do not be anxious about tomorrow: Give us this day our daily bread.

So, the meaning is clear. What most of us have to grapple with is how to pray this authentically when our larders are full to overflowing: bread for today, tomorrow, and next week. What does it mean to ask God to give us our daily bread when we already have it and more? Let me suggest two things, though there are many more.

First, let this be an exercise in and an expression of gratitude. Yes, I have much more than I need — more than just my daily bread — but it all came from God, from the breath he gave me daily, from the strength and health to work he gave me daily, from the peace and security he gave me daily. While, by his grace, I may have much laid up, it came daily and I should be grateful for it daily.

Second, let this prayer prompt an examination of your relationship with things. I am not a fan of streetside church signs. But occasionally I see a good one like the one I saw around Thanksgiving on a local Methodist Church. I can’t quote it exactly, but the gist was this: When God gives you abundance, don’t build bigger barns; build a longer table. In other words, when you have an abundance, don’t hoard; share. So, what does it mean that I have more than my daily — weekly — bread when some around our city do not, when some around me are often hungry? Perhaps I can be answer to this prayer for some of my brothers and sisters.

And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.
We need to consider this petition in light of Jesus’ own commentary on it in Matthew:

Matthew 6:14–15 (ESV): 14 For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, 15 but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Unfortunately (!) there is no ambiguity here, no wiggle-room. God’s forgiveness of us is in proportion to our own forgiveness of others. I have no reason to expect God to forgive me when I am willfully harboring a vengeful, unforgiving spirit toward others. This is in keeping with Jesus’ parable of the unforgiving servant (Mt 18:21-35). The notion was scandalous to Peter then, and it is scandalous to us now. But it is God’s word. So, as you pray this, it is the perfect time for some rigorous self-examination, or better yet, the time to ask God to examine your heart and reveal to you unforgiveness hidden there.

Now, just a word about forgiveness: it does not mean the full restoration of relationship with another who has sinned against you or the renewal of warm feelings when you have been hurt. Those things might come in the future, or they might not. Forgiveness means at least this: the refusal to take revenge, the relinquishing of judgment into God’s hands, the refusal to be an accuser of the other before God, and something like this prayer, echoing Jesus as he was being crucified and Stephen as he was being stoned: Father, do not hold this sin against [N.]; forgive him/her for my sake and help me also to forgive. Forgiveness is an act of will/obedience and not of emotions. And, it is a work in progress. It is a necessary work. As C. S. Lewis wrote: “To be a Christian means to forgive the inexcusable, because God has forgiven the inexcusable in you.”

And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.
I want to lay two texts alongside one another to help us with this part of the Prayer. About temptation, St. James writes:

James 1:12–15 (ESV): 12 Blessed is the man who remains steadfast under trial (πειρασμόν), for when he has stood the test he will receive the crown of life, which God has promised to those who love him. 13 Let no one say when he is tempted (πειραζόμενος), “I am being tempted (πειράζομαι) by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one. 14 But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire. 15 Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death.

So, James is clear: God does not tempt anyone — does not entice anyone — to evil.

Now, let’s compare this with St. Mark’s Gospel as it describes the immediate aftermath of Jesus’ baptism.

Mark 1:12–13 (ESV): 12 The Spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness. 13 And he was in the wilderness forty days, being tempted by Satan. And he was with the wild animals, and the angels were ministering to him.

The English translation is a bit mild here. The Greek text says the Spirit immediately “threw” Jesus out into the wilderness; there is a forcefulness in the original that is lacking in the translation. To be faithful to St. James and to St. Mark, we cannot say that God tempted Jesus; that was Satan’s doing. But, we can say — we must say — that God the Holy Spirit drove Jesus into the situation where the temptation would occur.

I think we may read the account of Jesus’ temptation a bit too sanguinely, with Jesus as the easy victor in something that is not really much of a contest. But, it really was a life-or-death spiritual battle with the fate of all creation on the line — the highest of stakes and the greatest of struggles. Jesus fasted and prayed for forty days before the temptation, not to make himself weak, but to give himself the spiritual strength to endure and overcome the temptation. That’s how serious and how difficult it was.

I think — and I stand to be corrected — that this may be the context in which we pray, “And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” Jesus taught us to pray this because he and he alone fully understood how “devilishly” hard temptation is to endure. I suspect it took every spiritual, physical, mental, and emotional resource he had to emerge victorious. I think it drained him, because the text says that the angels were ministering to him. Not wanting us to experience that same trial, not wanting us to fail, he bids us pray, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” That petition is a mark of his great love for us. And to pray it is an act of humility and dependence on our part. I do not trust myself, because I know how weak my faith can be. Better to be spared the temptation than to succumb to it.

For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever and ever. Amen.

These words, often referred to as the doxology, are not part of the original text of the Lord’s Prayer; they are, rather, an addition by the Church and are in keeping with similar doxologies found in the Psalms and in other biblical prayers. Some form of the doxology was is use by the second century and perhaps before as is evidence by the Didache, a late first or early second century church manual. If you’d like some additional information on this from a Roman Catholic perspective — history is history — then I suggest the following article:

Now, in closing, let’s pray again the words our Lord Jesus taught us to pray.

Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed by thy Name,

thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.

Give us this day our daily bread.

And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.

For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever and ever.

Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Glory of God in the Face of Christ

Apostles Anglican Church
Fr. John A. Roop

Last Sunday of Epiphany: Transfiguration
(1 Kings 19:9-18, Psalm 27, 2 Peter 1:13-21, Mark 9:2-9)

Mark 9:2 (ESV): 2 And after six days Jesus took with him Peter and James and John, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. And he was transfigured before them.

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

It’s really very simple; I don’t know why some people find this so confusing. This is calendar year 2024. But, the liturgical year actually started with Advent 2023 in December last. So, take 2023, divide it by 3 — always by three — and note the mathematical remainder. Certainly you remember remainders from long division? For the year 2023, the remainder is 1, which corresponds to lectionary year B. And that, obviously, means that St. Mark is the appointed Gospel for this year. Got it? It’s really very simple — if you are a liturgist and a mathematician.

There is a three-year cycle in the Eucharistic Lectionary: year A is the year of St. Matthew’s Gospel; year B, St. Mark’s, and year C, St. Luke’s. Then the cycle begins again: St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke, every three years. “But wait,” some of you might be thinking: three years, four Gospels. What about the Gospel according to St. John? Is it so unimportant that no year is devoted to it? No: entirely to the contrary. St. John’s Gospel is so important that the Church refuses to restrict its reading to a single year; portions of it are read across all three years. The three synoptic Gospels — Matthew, Mark, and Luke — recount events in Jesus’ life and ministry; the Gospel according to St. John reflects deeply on those events and provides a theological commentary on their meaning. That is an oversimplification — Saints Matthew, Mark, and Luke are fine theologians themselves and their Gospels are certainly reflective — but, in broad strokes the characterization is true. St. John is, after all, called The Theologian.

Today, we read and ponder the account of Jesus’ Transfiguration according to St. Mark. Let’s hear a portion of it again:

Mark 9:2–8 (ESV): 2 And after six days Jesus took with him Peter and James and John, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. And he was transfigured before them, 3 and his clothes became radiant, intensely white, as no one on earth could bleach them. 4 And there appeared to them Elijah with Moses, and they were talking with Jesus. 5 And Peter said to Jesus, “Rabbi, it is good that we are here. Let us make three tents, one for you and one for Moses and one for Elijah.” 6 For he did not know what to say, for they were terrified. 7 And a cloud overshadowed them, and a voice came out of the cloud, “This is my beloved Son; listen to him.” 8 And suddenly, looking around, they no longer saw anyone with them but Jesus only.

St. Mark here mentions an unearthly radiance and whiteness, particularly of Jesus’ clothes. What are we to make of this? St. John does not record this event; there is no parallel account in his Gospel. But, he does tell us what it means and how we are to understand it. Listen to this commentary from his Prologue:

John 1:1–5 (ESV): 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

John 1:14 (ESV): 14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.

St. John writes of light coming into the world, light that St. Mark pictures visually as unearthly radiance and whiteness. But, St. John tells us precisely what that light is: glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth — the glory of God, the glory of the Word who was in the beginning with God, who was and is God, and has become flesh. As St. Paul says:

2 Corinthians 4:6 (ESV): 6 For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

The glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ: that is what St. John — and St. Paul —says the disciples saw on the Mount of Transfiguration. St. John should know; he was there.

Glory: kavod in the Hebrew Old Testament, doxa in the Greek New Testament. But, regardless of language, what is it — what is glory? Linguistically, the words connote weightiness/gravitas, dignity, honor, splendor, brightness. Yes, all of these apply to the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ; all apply to what the disciples witnessed in the transfiguration. But, St. John would have us to understand glory as far more than this.

God’s glory is his self-revelation of goodness, truth, and beauty, of holiness and power, of divine love. It is not the very essence of God as he is known only to himself within and among the Trinity. But this glory is God’s self-revelation of himself to us insofar as we can receive and withstand it. God’s glory in the Transfiguration is hymned in the Church with these words:

You were transfigured upon the mount, O Christ our God, and your disciples, insofar as they could bear, beheld Your glory (Kontakion of the Transfiguration).

It is not for nothing that in the traditional icons of the Transfiguration the disciples are flat on their faces before the glory of the Lord. Only insofar as they could bear, they beheld the glory of Christ our God. As Fleming Rutledge expresses it:

[Glory] is [God’s] radiant revelation of himself, an emanation of his attributes that humans can receive only by faith. It is his outgoing, self-revelation perceived by disciples as dazzling radiance, yes — but more importantly still, as absolute power (Fleming Rutledge, Epiphany: The Season of Glory, InterVarsity Press (2023), p. 21).

And one falls on one’s face in the presence of absolute power, of power that called creation into being with but a word. That is what the three disciples saw in the Transfiguration, and they saw it revealed in the face of Jesus Christ. Not so very much later, Philip, who was not on the Mount, who did not see this glory said to Jesus:

John 14:8b-9a (ESV): 8…”Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us. 9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.”

Yes, that is the message of the Transfiguration. The unearthly radiance and whiteness of the Transfiguration is the glory of God the Father in the face of God the Son — of the Son who from that moment of transfiguration sets his face steadfastly toward Jerusalem to reveal God’s glory in a manner beyond our understanding: the glory of God in the face and body of a betrayed, denied, shamed, beaten, crucified — dead and buried — rejected King of the Jews. The Transfiguration and the Crucifixion are the bookends of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ, and the entire narrative arc of Scripture — the redemptive plan of God — unfolds between them.

In this narrative arc of Scripture, the glory of God acts powerfully to accomplish three purposes, more than three, really, but three which come together in Jesus on the mountain. The glory of God (1) breaks out to destroy, (2) breaks in to purify, and (3) breaks through to transfigure.

In the Lord of Spirits podcast, the hosts speak, not infrequently, of “death by holiness,” seen many times in the Old Testament and occasionally in the New Testament. Simply put, a recalcitrant, unrepentant sinner — one who adamantly and rebelliously refuses to return to the Lord — risks destruction by the Lord’s glory, a glory that breaks out to destroy.

Adam and Eve were exiled from Eden, not so much as punishment — though that element is present, too — but for their protection. Due to their rebellion, they could no longer safely dwell in the presence of God’s glory.

Later, God appeared on Sinai to give the Law.

Exodus 19:21–25 (ESV): 21 And the Lord said to Moses, “Go down and warn the people, lest they break through to the Lord to look and many of them perish. 22 Also let the priests who come near to the Lord consecrate themselves, lest the Lord break out against them.” 23 And Moses said to the Lord, “The people cannot come up to Mount Sinai, for you yourself warned us, saying, ‘Set limits around the mountain and consecrate it.’ ” 24 And the Lord said to him, “Go down, and come up bringing Aaron with you. But do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to the Lord, lest he break out against them.” 25 So Moses went down to the people and told them.

Further on in the narrative, Aaron’s own sons — priests — were destroyed by the glory of the Lord.

Leviticus 10:1–3 (ESV): 10 Now Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, each took his censer and put fire in it and laid incense on it and offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, which he had not commanded them. 2 And fire came out from before the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord. 3 Then Moses said to Aaron, “This is what the Lord has said: ‘Among those who are near me I will be sanctified, and before all the people I will be glorified.’ ” And Aaron held his peace.

This theme runs throughout the prophets, not least Amos.

Amos 5:6–7 (ESV): 6  Seek the Lord and live,
lest he break out like fire in the house of Joseph,
and it devour, with none to quench it for Bethel,

7  O you who turn justice to wormwood
and cast down righteousness to the earth!

We could multiply examples throughout the Old Testament narrative. In the New Testament, there is Paul’s warning about partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ in an unworthy manner: by so doing many of the Corinthians had become weak and ill, and many had died (rf 1 Cor 11:27ff). And there is the strange account of Ananias and Sapphira, struck dead by God for lying to the Holy Spirit.

These are sobering and cautionary tales for those who dare come into the presence of God’s glory unworthily, God’s glory that, in some such cases, breaks out to destroy.

But the glory of God also breaks in to purify as we see in Isaiah’s encounter with the Lord.

Isaiah 6:1–7 (ESV): 6 In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. 2 Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. 3 And one called to another and said:

“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts;
the whole earth is full of his glory!”

4 And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. 5 And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!”

6 Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. 7 And he touched my mouth and said: “Behold, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away, and your sin atoned for.”

Here the purifying glory of the Lord is mediated to Isaiah by a seraph, a throne guardian angel. The name says so much: seraphim, the burning ones. These holy servants of God who stand in his presence are burning with the fire of his glory even though they cover their eyes with their wings. Is it any wonder that Isaiah cries out that he is undone in his sinfulness — Woe is me! — because he has seen the King, the Lord of hosts? While his sin might indeed merit “death by holiness,” his repentance brings instead purification by glory.

The same is true generations before when the Lord, I Am That I Am, first appears to Moses.

Exodus 3:1–6 (ESV): 3 Now Moses was keeping the flock of his father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian, and he led his flock to the west side of the wilderness and came to Horeb, the mountain of God. 2 And the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush. He looked, and behold, the bush was burning, yet it was not consumed. 3 And Moses said, “I will turn aside to see this great sight, why the bush is not burned.” 4 When the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called to him out of the bush, “Moses, Moses!” And he said, “Here I am.” 5 Then he said, “Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground.” 6 And he said, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God.

Moses is not destroyed, but, like Isaiah yet to come, he is purified and commissioned.

Much later still in the Biblical narrative, the fisherman Peter falls at Jesus’ knees in his boat having seen the glory of God revealed in the miraculous draft of fishes, and he pleads, “Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord” (rf Luke 5:1 ff). But, Jesus has other ideas. Glory breaks in to purify the repentant, and then sends them on mission.

And, lastly, the glory of the Lord breaks through to transfigure. Moses entered the glory of the Lord in the tent of meeting and he was transfigured for a time; his face became so radiant with the glory of God, “that the Israelites could not gaze at Moses’ face because of the glory” (rf Ex 34:35, 2 Cor 3:7). And, drawing upon this St. Paul says:

2 Corinthians 3:17–18 (ESV): 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 18 And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.

As we behold the glory of the Lord in the face of Christ, we, too, are being transfigured — transformed into the very likeness of his glory.

Yes, in the great redemptive narrative arc of Scripture the glory of God (1) breaks out to destroy, (2) breaks in to purify, and (3) breaks through to transfigure. And these energies of the glory of God come rushing together on the mount as Jesus is transfigured — revealed to be the very glory of God — before Peter, James, and John.

The glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ — the glory seen on the Mount of Transfiguration and on Mount Calvary — breaks out to destroy not the sinner, but sin itself. It comes to shine the light on those who dwell in darkness and the shadow of death and to guide our feet into the way of peace — to end exile and illumine the way home.

The glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ — the glory seen on the Mount of Transfiguration and on Mount Calvary — breaks in to purify so that the words spoken on the Mount of Beatitudes might be true of us: Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God (Mt 5:8).

The glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ — the glory seen on the Mount of Transfiguration and on Mount Calvary — breaks through to transfigure. Once we were dead in trespasses and sin, once we followed the fallen powers, once we were slaves to the passions of the flesh, but now through Christ — through the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ — we have been seated with Christ in the heavenly places, transfigured from slaves to sons and daughters of God (rf Gal 2:1 ff). Now, through Jesus, we may come boldly before the throne of grace, into the presence of the glory of God (rf Heb 4:16).

This is what we, in our best moments, long for and hope for and pray for. It is something we should never take lightly or for granted. Lord, let your glory break out to destroy every last vestige of sin in us. Lord, let your glory break in to purify us of every defiling remnant of the world, the flesh, and the devil. Lord, let your glory break through to transfigure us into the image of your Son.

We dare not pray these things lightly. It is an awful thing to see the glory of the Lord, as Scripture attests. We will find ourselves on our faces, which is good and right, but also fearful and humbling. The Anglican poet John Donne captures this so beautifully in his Holy Sonnet XIV:

Batter my heart, three-personed God, for you
As yet but knock, breathe, shine, and seek to mend;
That I may rise, and stand, o’erthrow me, and bend
Your force to break, blow, burn, and make me new.

Mark 9:2 (ESV): 2 And after six days Jesus took with him Peter and James and John, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. And he was transfigured before them.

Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Providence and the n-body Problem

In physics, the n-body problem might be stated — certainly with a great deal of oversimplification — as follows:

Given the initial conditions (instantaneous position, velocity, and time) of a group of n celestial bodies under gravitational forces, predict their orbital characteristics at all future times.

One would think this would be relatively straightforward given the well established laws of Newtonian, and even relativistic, mechanics. One would be wrong. There are, indeed, no exact general solutions for n>2. That is, for as few as three bodies in motion, there is no exact general solution.

A similar difficulty obtains with the traveling salesman problem (TSP):

Given a list of cities and the distances between each pair of cities, what is the shortest possible route that visits each city exactly once and returns to the origin city (Wikipedia)?

For a relatively small number of cities, a calculation of each possible path is feasible and will yield the desired result. But for n cities, where n is a “large” number? Again, there is no general solution.

I mention these two mathematical conundrums only to demonstrate that the world is exceptionally complex and that our knowledge, though vast, soon reaches it limits.

An event occurs, one which is, by general consensus, considered evil, if not morally, then at least in the sense of opposing human flourishing and scandalizing society: a school shooting, a genocide, an act of terrorism, an abuse of innocence, a predatory act of the powerful against the powerless. On a personal level, the event might be the betrayal of a vow or trust, the terminal diagnosis, the end of a relationship. And the question comes: Why? Why did this happen?

It is little comfort but absolutely true to say that any such event is an n-body problem, a TSP. There are simply too many inputs and the relationships among the “bodies” are far too complex to permit an exact solution. A teenager comes out of a recreation center, two car screech to a stop, multiple masked boys jump out of the cars and open fire killing the teenager. Why? The “simple” answer might be that this is another gang-related dispute. But that explains nothing. Why are there gangs in the neighborhood in the first place? Why were guns accessible to teenagers? What could one boy do to others that “merits” murder? Answer any of the questions and you will generate a new question, the question tree branching ad infinitum. There are thousands of inputs to the equation: thousands of individual decisions that careen this way and that, impacting or glancing off other decisions, barely missing others, until the cars’ doors open and the bullets fly. It might have been different had not countless small influences conspired to produce this tragedy. Change any one of the inputs, and the outcome might have been entirely different.

Those who seek to move the question from the cultural/sociological realm to the spiritual one typically mean something different by the question, “Why?” Why? might more nearly mean, Where was God is all this? Given what we know about the character of God as revealed in Jesus Christ, I think we can rightly say that God was in the midst of every one of those countless decisions influencing them toward the good, the Holy Spirit now encouraging, now convicting, but not overriding the will of those who chose. That is my experience, at least. God will conspire to make my sin difficult and costly, to prick my conscience before I sin, to convict me preveniently. But, if I insist, God will leave me to my decision, to my devices, and to my consequences. As much as I might say I would like a world in which God would prevent (stop) me from making a sinful choice and committing an evil action, I cannot quite convince myself that that is true. The wrong that I do, I often do knowingly and willfully. And I do not, in the moment, want to be stopped. It seems that both God and I value my freedom. I do, in my best moments, long for that day when freedom will mean freedom from the passions that make me choose sin. I do not have enough of those best moments.

So, it does no good, it seems, to ask why an evil act occurred: the moral and spiritual world is too complex for either a general or specific solution. And generally, we usually mean something different when we ask, “Why?” any way, something more akin to: Why would God allow this to happen? I have no desire to be pedantic, but I must quibble a bit with the word “allow” as used in the question. If the implication of “allow” is that God simply sat back passively and watched this evil thing happen, then I think the question is flawed. My conviction — and I think the thrust of Scripture — not least the Sermon on the Mount — is that God is always and everywhere actively engaged for the good of all creation, that is, for the redemption and restoration of this fallen world and these fallen people. But, for reasons known to himself and only to himself, God usually chooses to work with fallen people in a fallen world by divine influence and not by divine fiat. God woos us and warns us; he does not usually ravish us or prevent us. Reality is, of course, more complicated than this general principle, but it is, on the whole, true. As we see in the life of the pharaoh, God may harden hearts that have already resolutely resisted him, confirming them in their rebellion. He does raise up peoples for his use, peoples who are willing to be so used — think the Babylonians — and yet holds them accountable when they exceed his mandate. He will and does call/elect people vocationally. All of this is more than mere influence, and yet even here, the individuals and nations made and make their choices.

Blame C. S. Lewis for this post, specifically his book “Miracles.” It has me thinking again of providence and miracles and natural law. Some have a “strong” view of providence which would maintain that every event was decreed in the mind and will of God from before the foundation of the world, that all is developing as indeed it must, even my writing of this and your reading of it. But, that is not the way it seems to me. I seem to have a choice in this decision to write and, indeed, in all the “decisions” of my life; hence, the need to pray for wisdom and discernment. I’m unable to reconcile discernment with the strongest notions of providence. Presbyterians can. I am not a Presbyterian.

My concept of providence is more akin to my time teaching in a secondary mathematics classroom. I knew the ultimate outcome of each lesson and, indeed, of the whole course; these ultimate goals were planned before I ever received my class rolls for the year. I could have scripted all my classes beforehand and could have forbidden any student engagement that might disrupt them: sit still, be quiet, do the assignments. But, for the benefit of the students, I gave them the dignity of real participation. I constantly interacted with the students to prompt appropriate learning and relational engagements. I exercised discipline when necessary to address misbehavior. Granted, some things happened that I didn’t intend and didn’t desire. But, I knew that I could address those adequately and often even turn them to good; I knew that I would reach the goals I had established. The students may not have known — could not have known but for my self-revelation — exactly why everything developed in the classroom the way it did. They had to learn to trust me, to trust that I was acting always for their good. Some learned that; some doubted me. Some flourished, and some, usually by their own choices or by ten thousand choices made in the years before by themselves and others, failed. Such was my providential governing of the classroom: always engaged for the flourishing of the students while allowing them the dignity of real choice and real participation.

That is, by no means, an adequate explanation of providence and even less of why any particular event occurred. But it does, at least for me, align with the notion of a God who is always actively engaged for good, a good which includes the power — for good and ill — of human freedom.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment